Rjack wrote:
> Nope. It's gospel truth like the saying "all license are contracts"
> that is put out to educate people concerning copyright licensing.
The gospel according to bill...
--
| spi...@freenet.co.uk | Windows95 (noun): 32 bit extensions and a|
| | gra
"Doug Mentohl" wrote in message
news:gmmuqd$od...@news.datemas.de...
amicus_curious wrote:
Your question is too complicated for a simple answer.
Please quote all relevant legislation in any jurisdiction ..
But in the context of this thread, the downloading is expressly permitted
and the
amicus_curious wrote:
Your question is too complicated for a simple answer.
Please quote all relevant legislation in any jurisdiction ..
But in the context of this thread, the downloading is expressly permitted and
the GPL allows for your unfettered personal use of both the binary image an
Andrew Halliwell wrote:
Hyman Rosen wrote:
Rjack wrote:
falsely convincing innocent programmers that the GPL
license can steal their exclusive rights granted to
them by under 17 USC 106.
What in the world are you talking about? How can a license
steal anything? The only way anyone's work fall
Hyman Rosen wrote:
> Rjack wrote:
>> falsely convincing innocent programmers that the GPL
>> license can steal their exclusive rights granted to
> > them by under 17 USC 106.
>
> What in the world are you talking about? How can a license
> steal anything? The only way anyone's work falls under th
Rjack wrote:
Sigh. . . a compiler "transforms" from one language representation
to another:
A compiler is a computer program (or set of programs) that
transforms source code written in a computer language (the source
language) into another computer language (the target language, often
having a b
Rjack wrote:
falsely convincing innocent programmers that the GPL
license can steal their exclusive rights granted to
> them by under 17 USC 106.
What in the world are you talking about? How can a license
steal anything? The only way anyone's work falls under the
GPL is if they voluntarily plac
David Kastrup wrote:
In a similar vein, if there is just one purpose behind a two-company
construct, then the judicial evaluation will take this into account.
These days, devices are built from parts supplied by many different
companies. There is no reason to suppose that the software for the
d
