-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> John Hasler
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>David Kastrup writes:
>> But that does not change that the copyright holder can ask a court to
>> stop Microsoft from distributing his software, and can claim damages
>> if he can m
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> David Kastrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Basically, this is not the GPL, but a different license using the same
>words in large parts. Maybe the FSF could demand that they call their
>license something else (but I don't
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Dancefire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I am confusing on GPL now, I need someone to clear me.
Or maybe you're not confused, but just unhappy that it doesn't condone
your desire to take away some of your customers' freedom
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Okay, I've received my assignment forms, but I'm not sure if I got the
right ones. I checked "yes" to "is there anyone who may have a claim to
the work", since at the very least I used company equipment, and also
even company time for some of the work
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> billwg
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Dumb ass. You need something to generate DOC files. That could be
>almost any WP made today, including OO. The broadband comment is
>totally looney, too.
At least there *is* Free Sof
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Stefaan A Eeckels
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>There can only be what the copyright holder decides the "source" code
>to be. If there's nothing left but the binary, then obviously the GPL
>makes little sense; any license t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Rui
Miguel Silva Seabra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Maybe, but since there's no source code, there's little value in using
>the GPL, and if it was used, a distributor could find himself in
>infringement since he could not
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Rui
Miguel Silva Seabra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Tue, 2006-02-21 at 11:32 +, Bernd Jendrissek wrote:
>> The reason I wonder is that there is still an awful lot of old
>> software fl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
(Or however the GPL defines "source code".)
Suppose I want to release some software but I either don't want to or
cannot (my house burned down 10 years ago and I lost the source
scenario) release source code for it.
Is it still possible for (legal) r
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Alexander Terekhov
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Bernd Jendrissek wrote:
>> employee's own machine, I wonder if that might require a pro forma
>> redistribution (into RAM) of an in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Alfred M\. Szmidt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>The employer cannot say that I am not allowed to do so, since that
>would violate the license.
The employer may not legally redistribute *and* then also require the
recipie
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Alexander Terekhov
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Bernd Jendrissek wrote:
>> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Alexander Terekhov
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >You seem
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Alexander Terekhov
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>You seem to misunderstand. The resulting overall program containing
>independent works for all its components is indeed "still just a
>compilation". But it now contains a der
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> David Kastrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>The GPL can only give the owner of a copy rights.
What if I, as a homeless vagrant scouring the city dump for cool stuff,
some across a three-year-old CD with a bunch of GNU pack
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Alexander Terekhov
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Original:
>
> unsigned explosive_power = 0;
> while (still_not_eliminated("FSF"))
>send_a_bomb("FSF", explosive_power += 10/*kiloton*/);
>
>Derivative:
>
> unsigned e
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Stefaan A Eeckels
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Actually, as far as I understand it, you would be the only person in
>trouble. The company might have a pre-release of David's GPLed
>software, but this does not give you, the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
http://www.cbn.co.za/dailynews.php?id=1152
> A common problem experienced by capital seekers is that many funds
> will only consider a business that has intellectual property such as
> patents. "This is especially frustrating," says de Waal, "because a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Alexander Terekhov
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The MySQL Protocol is proprietary.
[...]
> Because this is a GPL protocol, [...]
Make up your mind.
- --
"IBM has more patent litigation lawyers than SCO has employees."
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>How could the original founder of an open source project, protect and
>keep his project as his own, and prevent other external factors ( a
>company or group of developers) from getting his source
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Crossposting to gnu.misc.discuss, and alt.psychology.nlp since I think
this is WAY more topical there than the spam that infests g.m.d and the
trainer wars that infest a.p.n now.
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Michaela wrote:
>MCMLXVI wrote:
>> There
20 matches
Mail list logo
