David Kastrup [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think you are just confused.
Pretty much all the time.
--
John Forkosh ( mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] where j=john and f=forkosh )
___
gnu-misc-discuss mailing list
gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org
Ciaran O'Riordan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
JohnF [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I thought I'd already acknowledged that class of problems in a
preceding post in this thread (quoting myself) ...
Of course, I do condemn big companies, like, sometimes, MicroSoft,
when they try to dominate
Ciaran O'Riordan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
JohnF [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
let the best program win. If the commercial application is
truly better, maybe its superior functional specifications will
inspire an open source knock off.
It might, but it's predictable that the developer
David Kastrup [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
JohnF [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
David Kastrup [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
JohnF [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hadn't thought of that. But, on second thought now, I'd say,
let the best program win. If the commercial application is
truly better, maybe its
Hyman Rosen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
JohnF wrote:
But if I couldn't care less what you think,
then what right do you have to tell me what
to do with my own property?
The only thing that makes it your property is the
consensus of society that it benefits by putting its
resources behind
David Kastrup [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
JohnF [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ciaran O'Riordan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
JohnF [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
One thing that's for sure is that he'll have to distribute
MimeTex's source with the binary (or an offer to send people
the source on request
On Fri, 1 Aug 2008, Ciaran O'Riordan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
JohnF [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
One thing that's for sure is that he'll have to distribute
MimeTex's source with the binary (or an offer to send people
the source on request).
I'd thought a link to its homepage (where
Ciaran O'Riordan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi John,
These cases are never black and white, and I don't know PocketCAS or
MimeTex, so I can't give any advice on this situation, but here are some
general ramblings anyway...
Hi Ciaran,
Sure. Some general ramblings are exactly what I was
JohnF [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ciaran O'Riordan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Encouraging contributions isn't usually a motivation to switch to LGPL.
Writers of proprietary software will generally keep the most useful
functionality in their application code (rather than in your library
Looking for a discussion of the
advantages/disadvantages/repercussions/anything else relevant
of re-licensing my GPL'ed code www.forkosh.com/mimetex.html
under the LGPL instead. I've received several (a handful, not
a ton) of requests to do this, and have so far always just
replied, No. I
Ciaran O'Riordan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Encouraging contributions isn't usually a motivation to switch to LGPL. The
writers of proprietary software will generally keep the most useful
functionality in their application code (rather than in your library) and
will contribute as little as
11 matches
Mail list logo
