ported to the OpenSolaris
kernel (hence the xpost to c.u.s). My question is, is the same
type of copyright transfer needed to get this driver into OpenSolaris
proper? How would we handle code shared between the Linux and
OpenSolaris driver?
Thanks,
--
Mike Cox (the_real_mike_cox)
[EMAIL PROTECTED
lieve; and gdbm)
(2) If a required GPL library is missing on the user's system,
can I include a copy of this library in my software distribution?
--
Mike Cox (the_real_mike_cox)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
gnu-misc-discuss mailing list
gnu-misc-discu
On Oct 11, 3:10 am, John Hasler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mike Cox writes:
> > (1) Can I dynamically link my application with free libraries already
> > present on the target system, even if they're GPL'ed? (specifically,
> > libbfd, part of binutils, I bel
FAQ? Is it normative? Legaly binding?
> | I'd like to incorporate GPL-covered software in my proprietary
> | system. Can I do this?
Again, is mere dynamic linking the same as "incorporating GPL-covered
software"?
--
Mike Cox (the_real_mike_cox)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
gnu-misc-discuss mailing list
gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
On Oct 12, 5:37 pm, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 12, 2007 at 06:03:03AM -0700, Mike Cox wrote:
> > I am still confused. Does mere linking make the result realy
> > *contain* code from a GPL program?
>
> Most rational people consider
On Oct 14, 3:08 am, John Hasler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[bah, google groups seems broken]
> Mike Cox writes:
>> In a previous reply, rjack says that according to copyright law (1) is
>> legal too "unless contractually prohibited" but he also seems to think
>
On Oct 14, 3:08 am, John Hasler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mike Cox writes:
> > In a previous reply, rjack says that according to copyright law (1) is
> > legal too "unless contractually prohibited" but he also seems to think
> > the GPL is not a c
