Re: C++ equivalent to spaghetti code

2008-07-21 Thread Richard Heathfield
few. Whether I'd place it first or second is a tough call. (C++ ranks a close third in my estimation.) But I still suspect that there are at least a few BDP applications written in C nonetheless. Loads. Absolutely loads. -- Richard Heathfield http://www.cpax.org.uk Email: -http://www. +rjh

Re: C++ equivalent to spaghetti code

2008-07-20 Thread Richard Heathfield
James Kanze said: snip C was never really a good general purpose language. It was never used (nor even usable) in commercial software, for example. So MS Windows is not commercial software? Interesting. (Early versions of MS Windows were written almost entirely in C.) -- Richard

Re: C++ equivalent to spaghetti code

2008-07-20 Thread Richard Heathfield
could be improved here or there... it's broadly okay though... but - we did all this *years* ago! And you want us to write it *again*? -- Richard Heathfield http://www.cpax.org.uk Email: -http://www. +rjh@ Google users: http://www.cpax.org.uk/prg/writings/googly.php Usenet is a strange place - dmr

Re: C++ equivalent to spaghetti code

2008-07-20 Thread Richard Heathfield
overloading on user defined types (like C++). You don't need either of those to do accounting. More generally, C is pretty bad for text handling as well. It's easily good enough, given that just about the first thing most people do in C is start work on their text-handling libraries. -- Richard