On Feb 7, 1:50 am, RJack wrote:
>
> > Everyone wants a piece of you these days: Google, Facebook, Flickr,
> > Apple, AT&T, Bing. They’ll give you free e-mail, free photo storage,
> > free web hosting, even a free date. They just want to listen in. And
> > you can’t wait to let them. They’ll store
A negative amount if you include in your ads 'John Doe Computers
recommends Microsoft Windows' (as well as pre-loading all computers
sold with Windows and not pushing Linux stuff).
___
Gnu-misc-discuss mailing list
Gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org
http://lists.g
Karen Hill wrote:
> Take a look at my "Freedom License". The GPL is vulnerable in one
> particular way.
The GPL does not suit everyones' needs. There are some people who just
feel happier with M$ software complete with a EULA including a freedom
clause - one that allows the BSA to bang down yo
Karen Hill wrote:
> "I think, of the 500 distributions tracked by DistroWatch, probably 450
> of them are in trouble right now per this position.", says Warren
> Woodford, founder of the Memphis Linux distro.
>
> http://software.newsforge.com/article.pl?sid=06/06/23/1728205&tid=150
Indeed, Flatf
Alexander Terekhov wrote:
> > Sigh. We are talking about a _license_ here.
>
> I'll take it that you've finally groked that in spite of bullshit
> rhetoric spouted by Moglen and his client, IP licenses are contracts.
Are you a lawyer? Note that Eben Moglen is an Ivy League law professor
and has
> Moglen makes extraordinary claims about the GPL, so why doesn't he come
> forward with the appropriate legal citations?
There are not any - no one so far has had the guts to say to Eb - 'see
you in court'.
> Moglen is a J.D. with a
> Ph.D. in history and not an LL.M.
So how did he get admitted
On Apr 16, 2:36 am, Hyman Rosen wrote:
> On 4/15/2010 9:43 AM, RJack wrote:
>
> > The statement ". . . (a) Plaintiffs’ copyrights are unique and valuable
> > property whose market value is impossible to assess, . . ."
> > automatically establishes the fact that any alleged injury is
> > "conjectur
