Hey GNUtians,
Alexander Terekhov wrote:
http://www.usfca.edu/law/determann/softwarecombinations060403.pdf
-
PRELIMINARY DRAFT 2006/4/3 FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY
Accepted for Publication in Issue 21:4 (Fall 2006) of the
BERKELEY TECHNOLOGY LAW JOURNAL
DANGEROUS LIAISONS
---
b) Copyright Misuse
By imposing GPL § 2(b) on licensees, copyright owners try to magnify
their rights beyond those sanctioned by the Copyright Act in two
different ways. First, Section 103 of the Copyright Act allocates
ownership rights to authorized derivative works to the author to
The Prof. seems to be totally unaware of Wallace v GPL and yet he notes:
---
a) Competition Law
As previously observed, the applicability and effects of competition law
depend largely on the situation (i.e., on the affected markets and the
parties' market power.)271 Thus, competition laws
Alexander Terekhov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
---
b) Copyright Misuse
By imposing GPL § 2(b) on licensees, copyright owners try to magnify
their rights beyond those sanctioned by the Copyright Act in two
different ways. First, Section 103 of the Copyright Act allocates
ownership rights
Alexander Terekhov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The Prof. seems to be totally unaware of Wallace v GPL
Uh, nobody who wants to be taken seriously will sully himself by
mentioning a lawsuit from a private person without legal support who
is incapable of even stating a claim in multiple attempts.
Hey lazy GNUtian dak, why don't you simply read the paper before
starting to exibit your stupidity as usual?
--
2. GPL Terminology and Interpretation
a) Works based on the Program
The first operative Section of the GPL (Section 0) reads as follows:
This License applies to any program or
Alexander Terekhov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hey lazy GNUtian dak, why don't you simply read the paper before
starting to exibit your stupidity as usual?
--
2. GPL Terminology and Interpretation
a) “Works based on the Program”
The first operative Section of the GPL (Section 0) reads
