Rui Miguel Seabra wrote:
[... *BONK* ... *BONK*BONK* ...]
Well,
// Yet another Groklaw gadfly, so to speak
Wallace is just repeating what SCO claimed about IBM's Eight
Counterclaim:
2. The GPL Should Not Be Read to Allow a Competitor to Regulate What
May Be Charged for an Intellectual Pro
John Hasler wrote:
>
> Alexander Terekhov writes:
> > Does anyone have a link to the complaint? TIA.
>
> It's only available through PACER. I'm sure it'll be on Groklaw soon.
Indeed. Now, PJ's trash talk aside for a moment, does anyone have a
link to the amended complaint? ;-)
regards,
alexa
On Mon, 2005-05-02 at 18:19 +0200, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
> http://linuxbusinessnews.sys-con.com/read/80782.htm
The content looks like a late April Fool's joke.
Sadly it seems it isn't, but then again, it wouldn't be the first time
Maureen O'Gara derived "facts" out of absurd conclusions.
Alexander Terekhov writes:
> Does anyone have a link to the complaint? TIA.
It's only available through PACER. I'm sure it'll be on Groklaw soon.
--
John Hasler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, WI USA
___
Gnu-misc-discuss mailing list
Gnu
Alexander Terekhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> http://linuxbusinessnews.sys-con.com/read/80782.htm
Guffaw. It is the usual balanced reporting one has come to expect
from "Linuxbusinessnews" and its spin queen Maureen O'Gara. The
interesting question is just _who_ reads this stuff, given that
http://linuxbusinessnews.sys-con.com/read/80782.htm
Does anyone have a link to the complaint? TIA.
regards,
alexander.
___
Gnu-misc-discuss mailing list
Gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
