Best Buy squad arrived.
03/03/2010 56 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by David Leichtman on behalf of Best
Buy Co., Inc. (Leichtman, David) (Entered: 03/03/2010)
03/03/2010 57 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Hillel Ira Parness on behalf of
Best Buy Co., Inc. (Parness, Hillel) (Entered: 03/03/2010)
03/03/2010 58
Alexander Terekhov wrote:
Best Buy squad arrived.
03/03/2010 56 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by David Leichtman on behalf of Best
Buy Co., Inc. (Leichtman, David) (Entered: 03/03/2010)
03/03/2010 57 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Hillel Ira Parness on behalf of
Best Buy Co., Inc. (Parness, Hillel)
Judge Shira Scheindlin defies her own order.
01/07/2010 19 STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME OF DEFENDANT GCI
TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT, GCI Technologies
Corporation answer due 3/8/2010. No further extensions for this, or any
defendant in this action, will be
RJack wrote:
From the Erik Andersen vs. Best Buy et. al. Scheduling
Order entered Feb. 22, 2010 appearing on PACER as case no. 1:09-cv-10155-SAS
Shira A. Scheindlin U.S.D.J.
...
2. A concise statement of the issues as they then appear;
Pending results of Defendants'
Alexander Terekhov wrote:
RJack wrote:
From the Erik Andersen vs. Best Buy et. al. Scheduling Order
entered Feb. 22, 2010 appearing on PACER as case no.
1:09-cv-10155-SAS
Shira A. Scheindlin U.S.D.J. ...
2. A concise statement of the issues as they then appear;
Pending results of
On 2/24/2010 6:41 PM, RJack wrote:
Hyman Rosen wrote:
It doesn't mean anything until a court agrees.
Huh? IT DOESN'T MEAN ANYTHING UNTIL A COURT AGREES ???
That's correct. Claims made by each side are their own
maximalist versions of what they would like the court
to say. The purpose of
On 2/25/2010 3:44 AM, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
Defendants have endeavored to come into compliance with what
can only be described as a 'moving target'.
Translation:
Translation: we can expect a settlement soon, and Best Buy
(or Funai) will make the GPLed sources available.
On 2/25/2010 6:41 AM, RJack wrote:
I'm betting fifty to one that the SFLC folds with voluntary dismissals
before 15 March when Answers to Complaint are due.
And I'm betting that once the case ends, the defendants will
come into compliance with the GPL.
Hyman Rosen wrote:
[...]
The Insignia Blue Ray Player was manufactured by the Funai Corp.
out of Osaka, Japan. Funai clones were marketed under Phillips,
Maganavox, Sylvania and other brand names.
In which case I expect that a settlement will be announced, the
GPL sources will be made
Hyman Rosen wrote:
On 2/25/2010 3:44 AM, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
Defendants have endeavored to come into compliance with what
can only be described as a 'moving target'.
Translation:
Translation: we can expect a settlement soon, and Best Buy
(or Funai) will make the GPLed sources
From the Erik Andersen vs. Best Buy et. al. Scheduling
Order entered Feb. 22, 2010 appearing on PACER as case no. 1:09-cv-10155-SAS
Shira A. Scheindlin U.S.D.J.
...
2. A concise statement of the issues as they then appear;
Pending results of Defendants' investigations, Defendants
intend
On 2/24/2010 5:16 PM, RJack wrote:
Defendants intend to show...
As usual in lawsuits, both plaintiffs and defendants make
maximal claims. That's normal lawyering. It doesn't mean
anything until a court agrees.
By the way, I was wondering why Best Buy was being sued.
It turns out that the
Hyman Rosen wrote:
On 2/24/2010 5:16 PM, RJack wrote:
It doesn't mean anything until a court agrees.
Huh? IT DOESN'T MEAN ANYTHING UNTIL A COURT AGREES ???
ROFL
Some Free Softies insist that a requirement of a court ruling is
completely unnecessary and that plaintiffs' voluntary
13 matches
Mail list logo
