Rui Miguel Silva Seabra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 05:51:49 -0500
> From: rjack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (Windows/20070326)
Er, David's right -- I only see "<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>"; apparently either some
software on your end ap
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Rui Miguel Silva Seabra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>In your email's headers one can read:
He's not sending email. He's posting an article to the gnu.misc.discuss
newsgroup. If you are seeing it as email, it's because you are using
a usenet-to-email gateway, and
Sáb, 2007-05-26 às 12:16 -0500, rjack escreveu:
> Now I'm not such a bad guy after all am I?
You're a complete dimwit second personality of Alexander Terekhov.
Rui
--
+ No matter how much you do, you never do enough -- unknown
+ Whatever you do will be insignificant,
| but it is very important
Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
Sáb, 2007-05-26 às 11:27 -0500, John Hasler escreveu:
I see "From: rjack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" reading via Usenet. If I was receiving
the
mailing list I would see "From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" but I would not be
disturbed because I know how my email software works.
Rui Miguel Silva Seabra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Sáb, 2007-05-26 às 18:40 +0200, Alfred M. Szmidt escreveu:
>> David is correct, it is your setup that is b0rked. Here is the full
>> message with header and all. You can even look at ftp://lists.gnu.org
>> and see how it is handled for the ma
Rui Miguel Silva Seabra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Sáb, 2007-05-26 às 11:27 -0500, John Hasler escreveu:
>> I see "From: rjack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" reading via Usenet. If I was
>> receiving the
>> mailing list I would see "From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" but I would not be
>> disturbed because I k
I see "From: rjack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" reading via Usenet. If I was
receiving the mailing list I would see "From:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" but I would not be disturbed because I know
how my email software works.
Depends on who is on the receiving end, my messages come through as
addresse
Sáb, 2007-05-26 às 11:27 -0500, John Hasler escreveu:
> I see "From: rjack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" reading via Usenet. If I was
> receiving the
> mailing list I would see "From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" but I would not be
> disturbed because I know how my email software works.
My MTA rejects [EMAIL PRO
Sáb, 2007-05-26 às 18:40 +0200, Alfred M. Szmidt escreveu:
> David is correct, it is your setup that is b0rked. Here is the full
> message with header and all. You can even look at ftp://lists.gnu.org
> and see how it is handled for the mailing lists.
Explain how come my MTA *rejects* [EMAIL PRO
rjack writes:
> The address "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" is faked to prevent GNU disciples and
> SPAMMERS
The proper way to obfuscate your email is to use something like
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" or "[EMAIL PROTECTED],invalid". These domains are
reserved.
Rui writes:
> In your email's headers one can read:
>
Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
>
> Sáb, 2007-05-26 às 05:51 -0500, rjack escreveu:
> > Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
> > > Your credibility was ruined long ago, and is only gone even deeper by
> > > faking your email in order to get spam-bots onto my mail server.
> > >
> > > STOP FAKING YOUR F
-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint
properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.34
Xref: shelby.stanford.edu gnu.misc.discuss:93598
To: gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org
Subject: Re: GNU FUD
X-BeenThere: gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: General GNU project an
Sáb, 2007-05-26 às 18:24 +0200, David Kastrup escreveu:
> Rui Miguel Silva Seabra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Sáb, 2007-05-26 às 12:07 +0200, David Kastrup escreveu:
> >> Rui Miguel Silva Seabra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >>
> >> > Your credibility was ruined long ago, and is only gone e
Rui Miguel Silva Seabra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Sáb, 2007-05-26 às 12:07 +0200, David Kastrup escreveu:
>> Rui Miguel Silva Seabra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> > Your credibility was ruined long ago, and is only gone even deeper by
>> > faking your email in order to get spam-bots onto
Please stop spamming the list with profanity, it isn't useful.
___
gnu-misc-discuss mailing list
gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
Sáb, 2007-05-26 às 12:07 +0200, David Kastrup escreveu:
> Rui Miguel Silva Seabra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Your credibility was ruined long ago, and is only gone even deeper by
> > faking your email in order to get spam-bots onto my mail server.
> >
> > STOP FAKING YOUR FROM ADDRESS
> >
>
David Kastrup wrote:
>
> Alexander Terekhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > David Kastrup wrote:
> > [...]
> >> By the way: I agree with your assessment of Alexander being an avid
> >> observer of what you call "Intellectual Property law" (there is
> >
> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category
Alexander Terekhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> David Kastrup wrote:
> [...]
>> By the way: I agree with your assessment of Alexander being an avid
>> observer of what you call "Intellectual Property law" (there is
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Intellectual_property_law
>
>> actually
David Kastrup wrote:
[...]
> By the way: I agree with your assessment of Alexander being an avid
> observer of what you call "Intellectual Property law" (there is
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Intellectual_property_law
> actually no such thing, as there are disparate laws about the items
rjack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
>> Your credibility was ruined long ago, and is only gone even deeper by
>> faking your email in order to get spam-bots onto my mail server.
>>
>> STOP FAKING YOUR FROM ADDRESS
>>
>> You DO NOT come from com.1407.org
>>
>> Rui
>>
>
Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
Your credibility was ruined long ago, and is only gone even deeper by
faking your email in order to get spam-bots onto my mail server.
STOP FAKING YOUR FROM ADDRESS
You DO NOT come from com.1407.org
Rui
The address "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" is faked to prevent GNU d
Rui Miguel Silva Seabra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Your credibility was ruined long ago, and is only gone even deeper by
> faking your email in order to get spam-bots onto my mail server.
>
> STOP FAKING YOUR FROM ADDRESS
>
> You DO NOT come from com.1407.org
While I agree that the original po
Your credibility was ruined long ago, and is only gone even deeper by
faking your email in order to get spam-bots onto my mail server.
STOP FAKING YOUR FROM ADDRESS
You DO NOT come from com.1407.org
Rui
--
+ No matter how much you do, you never do enough -- unknown
+ Whatever you do will be in
rjack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The holding in Lexmark International, Inc. v. Static Control
> Components, Inc., 387 F.3d 522 (6th Cir. 2004) unequivocally
> demonstrates that a copyright license may not control source code
> that implements a step in a process patent under U.S. law.
You mean
The holding in Lexmark International, Inc. v. Static Control Components,
Inc., 387 F.3d 522 (6th Cir. 2004) unequivocally demonstrates that a
copyright license may not control source code that implements a step in
a process patent under U.S. law.
The above result may not be true in non-U.S. juris
25 matches
Mail list logo
