David Kastrup wrote:
[...]
> > The legally unsound bit was about the FSF "position" regarding
> > dynamic linking.
>
> Which is not codified in either license since
Read the latest draft, moron.
regards,
alexander.
___
gnu-misc-discuss mailing list
g
Alexander Terekhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ciaran O'Riordan wrote:
> [...]
>> Dan's blog entry quoted a lawyer who's being consulted during the draftign
>> of GPLv3 who said that parts of GPLv3 aren't legally sound.
>
> He said that GPLv3 draft is even worse than GPLv2 which nobody
> unde
Alexander Terekhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> First sale, moron. Wanna have a copy of Emacs (modified)under draconian
> EULA-style contract imposing forbearance from rights granted to "users"
> under the GPL and without an offer to obtain source code? Ten EUROs.
You are drunk enough as it is
First sale, moron. Wanna have a copy of Emacs (modified)under draconian
EULA-style contract imposing forbearance from rights granted to "users"
under the GPL and without an offer to obtain source code? Ten EUROs.
regards,
alexander.
___
gnu-misc-discus
Go to doctor, mini-RMS.
regards,
alexander.
___
gnu-misc-discuss mailing list
gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
Ciaran O'Riordan wrote:
[...]
> Dan's blog entry quoted a lawyer who's being consulted during the draftign
> of GPLv3 who said that parts of GPLv3 aren't legally sound.
He said that GPLv3 draft is even worse than GPLv2 which nobody
understands. The legally unsound bit was about the FSF "positi
Alexander Terekhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> David Kastrup wrote:
> [...]
>> intended by the licensor: yes, the copyright holder has the "control"
>
> There are limitations, such as free (of copyright control) distribution
> of copies lawfully made and free (of copyright control) modification
David Kastrup wrote:
[...]
> intended by the licensor: yes, the copyright holder has the "control"
There are limitations, such as free (of copyright control) distribution
of copies lawfully made and free (of copyright control) modification,
copying, and distribution of those additional exact co
Alexander Terekhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> David Kastrup wrote:
>>
>> Alexander Terekhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> > David Kastrup wrote:
>> > [...]
>> >> benefitting the general public
>> >
>> > Hey dak, care to address the following (2nd one below) Dan's comment
>> > regarding th
Qui, 2006-10-19 às 14:31 +0200, Alexander Terekhov escreveu:
> > The FSF does not even "control" ...
>
> http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl.txt
>
> "the intent is to ... control the distribution of derivative or
> collective works based on the Program."
>
> eh?
How very manipulative of you. A pity
Alexander Terekhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> http://floatingpoint.wordpress.com/2006/10/16/off-the-record/#comments
>
> --
> Dan Lyons // Oct 17th 2006 at 7:52 am
>
> Translation: Nothing to worry about here, folks. Just move along,
Dan is replying there to a comment I posted.
Dan's
David Kastrup wrote:
>
> Alexander Terekhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > David Kastrup wrote:
> > [...]
> >> benefitting the general public
> >
> > Hey dak, care to address the following (2nd one below) Dan's comment
> > regarding the "public"?
>
> Just a rant, and obviously so.
http://
Alexander Terekhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> David Kastrup wrote:
> [...]
>> benefitting the general public
>
> Hey dak, care to address the following (2nd one below) Dan's comment
> regarding the "public"?
Just a rant, and obviously so. The FSF does not even "control"
further development
David Kastrup wrote:
[...]
> benefitting the general public
Hey dak, care to address the following (2nd one below) Dan's comment
regarding the "public"?
http://floatingpoint.wordpress.com/2006/10/16/an-open-source-ceo-on-the-gplv3/#comments
--
Crosbie Fitch // Oct 18th 2006 at 4:03
Alexander Terekhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> David Kastrup wrote:
> [...]
>> I am not getting paid for the voluntary work I do within the GNU
>> project, which is neither my job nor part of my job description. The
>
> And what is your "job description"? I'm just curious: once and for
> all, a
David Kastrup wrote:
[...]
> I am not getting paid for the voluntary work I do within the GNU
> project, which is neither my job nor part of my job description. The
And what is your "job description"? I'm just curious: once and for all,
are you employed or not, dak? Or may be you're a lucky dot-
Alexander Terekhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> David Kastrup wrote:
> [...]
>> Uh, why should he? The law is his profession. Since when should a
>> person not get paid for doing his job?
>
> Are you getting paid for doing your GNU job?
I am not getting paid for the voluntary work I do within
David Kastrup wrote:
[...]
> Uh, why should he? The law is his profession. Since when should a
> person not get paid for doing his job?
Are you getting paid for doing your GNU job? Your comrade ams seems to
be on public support.
http://www.update.uu.se/~ams/home/resume
-
Work Status: un
Alexander Terekhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hey dak, both fellows have really good appetite (they should really try
> to eat a bit less).
RMS is not exactly known for a luxurious life style.
> And speaking of Eben,
>
> http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1139911511108
> (Meet the DotComm
Hey dak, both fellows have really good appetite (they should really try
to eat a bit less). And speaking of Eben,
http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1139911511108
(Meet the DotCommunist)
-
Moglen puts it more simply: "I know how to hook up people who have
money with the people who have p
Alexander Terekhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Dan Lyons reports:
>
> http://floatingpoint.wordpress.com/2006/10/17/bruce-perens-on-gplv3/
>
> --
> While we’re on the subject of the “price” of “free” software (a notion
> that may seem paradoxical to some), a while back I had a chance to spea
Dan Lyons reports:
http://floatingpoint.wordpress.com/2006/10/17/bruce-perens-on-gplv3/
--
While were on the subject of the price of free software (a notion
that may seem paradoxical to some), a while back I had a chance to speak
with Bruce Perens, a well-known free software advocate, ab
22 matches
Mail list logo
