Re: Mixing Licenses ... any hints needed

2006-06-28 Thread Alexander Terekhov
Wolfdieter Schmidt wrote: Newsgroup, I am currently planning to write a program which uses Trolltech Qt 4. And I will use the Qt4 - GPL version. So as I understand my code has to be GPL. You understand it wrong. The FSF and Trolltech simply want you to believe in their utterly moronic

Re: Mixing Licenses ... any hints needed

2006-06-28 Thread Wei Mingzhi
In my opinion, using non-free artwork files is not illegal as this is actually what Red Hat is doing. But I'm not sure about this as I'm not a lawyer, and this is obviously not what Trolltech intended. And I'd also strongly discourage using non-free data files (finding some free ones - not just

Re: Mixing Licenses ... any hints needed

2006-06-28 Thread David Kastrup
Alexander Terekhov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...] this is obviously not what Trolltech intended Trolltech's intentions is smoking gun stuff to invalidate the whole scheme once and for all. I still wonder why Wallace didn't name Trolltech, Inc., Palo Alto as a

Re: Mixing Licenses ... any hints needed

2006-06-28 Thread Alexander Terekhov
David Kastrup wrote: Alexander Terekhov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...] this is obviously not what Trolltech intended Trolltech's intentions is smoking gun stuff to invalidate the whole scheme once and for all. I still wonder why Wallace didn't name

Re: Mixing Licenses ... any hints needed

2006-06-28 Thread David Kastrup
Alexander Terekhov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: David Kastrup wrote: Alexander Terekhov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...] this is obviously not what Trolltech intended Trolltech's intentions is smoking gun stuff to invalidate the whole scheme once and for

Re: Mixing Licenses ... any hints needed

2006-06-28 Thread Alexander Terekhov
David Kastrup wrote: [...] But Novell and RedHat are not responsible for the interpretation Trolltech places on the parts copyrighted by Trolltech. Both Novell and Red Hat are *parties* to the agreement with Trolltech covering Qt under the GPL (without that agreement they would have no

Re: Mixing Licenses ... any hints needed

2006-06-28 Thread David Kastrup
Alexander Terekhov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: David Kastrup wrote: [...] But Novell and RedHat are not responsible for the interpretation Trolltech places on the parts copyrighted by Trolltech. Both Novell and Red Hat are *parties* to the agreement with Trolltech covering Qt under the GPL

Re: Mixing Licenses ... any hints needed

2006-06-28 Thread David Kastrup
Alexander Terekhov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: David Kastrup wrote: Alexander Terekhov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: David Kastrup wrote: [...] But Novell and RedHat are not responsible for the interpretation Trolltech places on the parts copyrighted by Trolltech. Both Novell and Red

Re: Mixing Licenses ... any hints needed

2006-06-28 Thread Alexander Terekhov
David Kastrup wrote: [... Wallace vs IBM et all (plus Trolltech) ...] They got _permission_. The GPL is a grant of IP rights established by the copyright and patent laws, idiot. It's a contract, retard. (The patent license is implied, not express.) - An intellectual property license

Re: Mixing Licenses ... any hints needed

2006-06-28 Thread Alexander Terekhov
David Kastrup wrote: [...] And download pursuant to GPL is such an arrangement. http://www.nysd.uscourts.gov/courtweb/pdf/D02NYSC/01-07482.PDF regards, alexander. ___ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org

Mixing Licenses ... any hints needed

2006-06-27 Thread Wolfdieter Schmidt
Newsgroup, I am currently planning to write a program which uses Trolltech Qt 4. And I will use the Qt4 - GPL version. So as I understand my code has to be GPL. No problem so far. But like every modern GUI, I need icons, buttons and some tiny pictures. Now the question is: Can these