Lee Hollaar wrote:
[...]
methods implemented in computer software.
Forward Inline
Original Message
Path: uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Alexander Terekhov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Newsgroups: gnu.misc.discuss
Subject: Re: The many ways confusion
Date: Fri, 25 May
http://blog.actonline.org/2007/05/microsoft_paten.html
--
Microsoft Patents FUD Report: Who is Actually Slinging it?
My morning news review had me chuckling this morning. Following Matt
Asay's post on the InfoWorld Open Sources blog, I watched Eben Moglen's
passionate attack on the
Alexander Terekhov wrote:
http://blog.actonline.org/2007/05/microsoft_paten.html
-- Microsoft Patents FUD Report: Who is Actually Slinging it?
My morning news review had me chuckling this morning. Following Matt
Asay's post on the InfoWorld Open Sources blog, I watched Eben
Moglen's
Lee Hollaar wrote:
[...]
If there is a single way (or maybe a very, very limited way) of
expressing an idea, it is said that the idea and the expression
have merged and therefore the expression is not protectable by
copyright.
That has nothing to do with whether there is a patent that
Lee Hollaar wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] rjack [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What is utterly laughable is the fact that a purported copyright
license like the GPL3 *cannot* effect matters concerning patents. If
source code implements a patentable idea then the source code in
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] rjack [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What is utterly laughable is the fact that a purported copyright
license like the GPL3 *cannot* effect matters concerning patents. If
source code implements a patentable idea then the source code in
quenstion cannot be
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Lee Hollaar wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] rjack [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What is utterly laughable is the fact that a purported copyright
license like the GPL3 *cannot* effect matters concerning patents. If
source code
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Lee Hollaar wrote:
[...]
If there is a single way (or maybe a very, very limited way) of
expressing an idea, it is said that the idea and the expression
have merged and therefore the expression is not protectable by
copyright.
That has
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] rjack [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Lee Hollaar wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Lee Hollaar wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] rjack [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What is utterly laughable is the fact that a purported copyright
license
Lee Hollaar wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Lee Hollaar wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] rjack [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What is utterly laughable is the fact that a purported copyright
license like the GPL3 *cannot* effect matters concerning patents. If
10 matches
Mail list logo
