Re: Samsung's answer to SFLC gang

2010-05-04 Thread Alexander Terekhov
From pacer... interesting bits from Samsung's answer : Defendant denies that Mr. Anderson is the author or developer of the BusyBox computer program, and the owner of the copyright in that computer program. FIRST AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE (Failure to State a Claim) 36. As a separate and distinct

Re: Samsung's answer to SFLC gang

2010-05-04 Thread RJack
Alexander Terekhov wrote: From pacer... interesting bits from Samsung's answer : Defendant denies that Mr. Anderson is the author or developer of the BusyBox computer program, and the owner of the copyright in that computer program. FIRST AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE (Failure to State a Claim) 36.

Re: Samsung's answer to SFLC gang

2010-05-04 Thread David Kastrup
RJack u...@example.net writes: Alexander Terekhov wrote: WHEREFORE, Defendant prays for the following relief: 1. That Plaintiffs take nothing by their Complaint; 2. That Defendant be dismissed from this action with prejudice; 3. For its costs of suit incurred herein; 4. For its attorney

Re: Samsung's answer to SFLC gang

2010-05-04 Thread RJack
David Kastrup wrote: RJack u...@example.net writes: Alexander Terekhov wrote: WHEREFORE, Defendant prays for the following relief: 1. That Plaintiffs take nothing by their Complaint; 2. That Defendant be dismissed from this action with prejudice; 3. For its costs of suit incurred herein; 4.