Wallace case FAQ for dummies v1.7

2006-07-06 Thread Alexander Terekhov
(This is regular posting. Acknowledgments: aim_here2002, Linonut.) Q: Bt. What the fuck ... !? A: The context is property. Intangible intellectual property (rights granted under IP license). IP goods. Property in short. Q: Bt, but according to RMS, intellectual property... is a

Re: Wallace case FAQ for dummies v1.7

2006-07-06 Thread s. keeling
[Followup-To: header set to gnu.misc.discuss.] Alexander Terekhov [EMAIL PROTECTED]: (This is regular posting. Acknowledgments: aim_here2002, Linonut.) ... Much to our dismay. A: Lunatic RMS is simply confusing reality with his dreams of the GNU For one who bitches so bloody much about

Re: Wallace case FAQ for dummies v1.7

2006-07-06 Thread Alexander Terekhov
Linux Counter #80292 wrote: [...] [Followup-To: header set to gnu.misc.discuss.] Ignored. Alexander Terekhov [EMAIL PROTECTED]: (This is regular posting. Acknowledgments: aim_here2002, Linonut.) ... Much to our dismay. A: Lunatic RMS is simply confusing reality with his dreams of

Re: Wallace case FAQ for dummies v1.7

2006-07-06 Thread David Kastrup
Alexander Terekhov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Linux Counter #80292 wrote: [...] [Followup-To: header set to gnu.misc.discuss.] Ignored. Alexander Terekhov [EMAIL PROTECTED]: (This is regular posting. Acknowledgments: aim_here2002, Linonut.) ... Much to our dismay. A: Lunatic RMS

Re: Wallace case FAQ for dummies v1.7

2006-07-06 Thread Alexander Terekhov
David Kastrup wrote: [... get a life ...] That's something that Stallman happens to have. http://www.fsf.org/photos/rms-sign.jpg Uh, lunatic. regards, alexander. ___ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list

Re: Wallace case FAQ for dummies v1.7

2006-07-06 Thread Rui Miguel Silva Seabra
Qui, 2006-07-06 às 21:25 +0200, Alexander Terekhov escreveu: David Kastrup wrote: [... get a life ...] That's something that Stallman happens to have. http://www.fsf.org/photos/rms-sign.jpg Uh, lunatic. Why? The time loss was minimal, and it was