* Alfred M. Szmidt:
>> I placed the list on moderation to help with cooling down heated
>> discussions. It is entirely within the normal bounds of list
>> management to use moderation.
>
>It's actually very unusual to see this on technical/FOSS lists. Some
>communities have se
> I placed the list on moderation to help with cooling down heated
> discussions. It is entirely within the normal bounds of list
> management to use moderation.
It's actually very unusual to see this on technical/FOSS lists. Some
communities have secret and not-so-secret bans for
* DJ Delorie [2019-10-30 18:21]:
> Dora Scilipoti writes:
> > Oh! I thought the conversations here were started to talk about a new
> > governance model specifically for GNU.
>
> Well... it's all related, but each sub-project in GNU itself needs a
> local governance model, and even if it's diffe
Jean Louis writes:
> 2. dictator, potentate -- (a ruler who is unconstrained by law)
> 3. authoritarian, dictator -- (a person who behaves in a tyrannical
> manner; "my boss is a dictator who makes everyone work overtime")
These. It was Uli at the time. The experience was very negative.
Dora Scilipoti writes:
> Oh! I thought the conversations here were started to talk about a new
> governance model specifically for GNU.
Well... it's all related, but each sub-project in GNU itself needs a
local governance model, and even if it's different than the top-level
GNU model, they intera
* Dora Scilipoti [2019-10-30 04:37]:
> Hello,
>
> almost five days after submitting my request for subscription, it was
> finally approved. And a few hours before the approval happened, the
> moderation rules were updated with yet more restrictions, and this
> particular point:
>
> Tue, 29 Oct 2
Dora Scilipoti writes:
> What if I want to propose a governance model that includes someone as
> head of a committee, for example. Am I not allowed to name and talk
> about the qualities of the person I consider relevant for the position?
*Here* it's reasonable to talk about how the *model* wor
On 10/29/2019 11:41 PM, DJ Delorie wrote:
> I think that's an appropriate divide between globally-useful
> information, and project-specific information.
Oh! I thought the conversations here were started to talk about a new
governance model specifically for GNU.
--
Dora Scilipoti
GNU Education
Hello,
almost five days after submitting my request for subscription, it was
finally approved. And a few hours before the approval happened, the
moderation rules were updated with yet more restrictions, and this
particular point:
Tue, 29 Oct 2019 10:31:37 +0100, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> And for gov
"Carlos O'Donell" wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 10:21 AM Dmitry Alexandrov <321...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Mark Wielaard wrote:
>> > On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 05:22:48AM +0300, Dmitry Alexandrov wrote:
>> >> Iʼd like to report that my message number d0eidcqu.321...@gmail.com
>> >> (below), sent a
On Mon, 2019-10-28 at 16:28 -0400, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> In this case the intent was to keep the conversations on topic for the
> list in question as documented for gnu-misc-discuss:
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss (which I
> didn't write).
So specifically for this lis
On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 4:30 PM Florian Weimer wrote:
>
> * Carlos O'Donell:
>
> > The GNU C Library main development list was pre-moderated for almost 5
> > years. During that period we moved a lot of conversations to the glibc
> > help mailing list using moderation. This helped new users get sta
* Carlos O'Donell:
> I placed the list on moderation to help with cooling down heated
> discussions. It is entirely within the normal bounds of list
> management to use moderation.
It's actually very unusual to see this on technical/FOSS lists. Some
communities have secret and not-so-secret bans
* Carlos O'Donell:
> The GNU C Library main development list was pre-moderated for almost 5
> years. During that period we moved a lot of conversations to the glibc
> help mailing list using moderation. This helped new users get started
> in a more welcoming environment. Just an example of a publi
On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 4:10 PM Florian Weimer wrote:
>
> * Carlos O'Donell:
>
> > I placed the list on moderation to help with cooling down heated
> > discussions. It is entirely within the normal bounds of list
> > management to use moderation.
>
> It's actually very unusual to see this on techn
On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 10:21 AM Dmitry Alexandrov <321...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Mark Wielaard wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 05:22:48AM +0300, Dmitry Alexandrov wrote:
> >> Iʼd like to report that my message number d0eidcqu.321...@gmail.com
> >> (below), sent a day ago to gnu-misc-discuss@gn
Mark Wielaard wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 05:22:48AM +0300, Dmitry Alexandrov wrote:
>> Iʼd like to report that my message number d0eidcqu.321...@gmail.com (below),
>> sent a day ago to gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org (which I am subscribed on and
>> usually have no problems to post to), had not l
17 matches
Mail list logo
