Hi!
I just spent a little time playing with the gimp.
Enjoy!
Herbert.
--
Herbert Thoma
FhG-IIS A, Studio Department
Am Weichselgarten3, 91058 Erlangen, Germany
Phone: +49-9131-776-323
Fax: +49-9131-776-399
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.iis.fhg.de/
gnu_bill.gif
Just to reiterate what Dave said, but in a little more dramatic
fashion to hopefully catch everyone's attention.
We're not kidding about the upcoming changes. After we add this
upcoming big patch
DO NOT USE UNSTABLE FOR ANY DATA YOU EVER WANT TO SEE AGAIN
at least not for a while. Even
Rob Browning wrote:
As far as I can tell, the latest version of g-wrap
works fine with
guile 1.3.4 and guile 1.4 on my system(s).
Since it would be somewhat difficult/time-consuming for me to install
guile-1.3 and add backward compatibility and test g-wrap, I'm trying
to figure out if it would
Richard -Gilligan- Uschold [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm using guile 1.3, only because the rpm I downloaded for 1.4.4
required it. I thought it odd that it wasn't using a more recent
version. I'll upgrade to 1.4.7 to see if that solves the problem.
I seem to recall that there was some
[ Related to gnucash because Peter's trying to help with the guile 1.3
problem. ]
There's either something wrong with your mail setup, or you're using
one of the super-anal spamblockers. Either way, mail I'm sending you
is bouncing.
Some of the more agressive blockers block all time-warner
Herbert Thoma writes:
Hi!
I just spent a little time playing with the gimp.
Enjoy!
That's cool! Nice work.
dave
___
gnucash-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.gnumatic.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
A while ago (check the mail archives), we had a discussion on
share reporting, and specifically, calculating share cost basis.
The upshot was that we need to track which parcel of shares a share
sale comes from. With the new file format and hash store now
available, it's time to think about
Are you looking at a new account for each parcel of shares?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Robert
Graham Merkel
Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2000 10:35 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Implementing proper cost basis tracking for
Phillip Shelton writes:
Are you looking at a new account for each parcel of shares?
Sorry, I'm not quite following your comment.
For my "alternative" solution to the "share related expense/income",
each "share account" (each individual stock, not each parcel), you
would need at least two
Sorry for being obscure.
I had thought you meant a new account for each parcel.
-Original Message-
From: Robert Graham Merkel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2000 11:16 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Implementing proper cost
Robert Graham Merkel writes:
A while ago (check the mail archives), we had a discussion on
share reporting, and specifically, calculating share cost basis.
The upshot was that we need to track which parcel of shares a share
sale comes from. With the new file format and hash store now
Dave Peticolas writes:
Robert Graham Merkel writes:
A while ago (check the mail archives), we had a discussion on
share reporting, and specifically, calculating share cost basis.
The upshot was that we need to track which parcel of shares a share
sale comes from. With the new file
12 matches
Mail list logo