Re: Guile 1.3 + G-wrap 0.9.8 patches

Robert Graham Merkel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Yeah, it's just that I was trying not to *force* people to upgrade their g-wrap if don't have to. If we put in a call in gnucash to an autoconf macro only distributed with 0.9.8, they have to upgrade. I have no objection to including the code

Re: Guile 1.3 + G-wrap 0.9.8 patches

Dave Peticolas [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I have added the patch to the devel tree and placed the patched version of g-wrap.m4 in acinclude.m4. In the long run, though, g-wrap.m4 should be picked up from the installation of g-wrap, I think. It is, at least in g-wrap 0.9.8. If you'd like, I

Re: Guile 1.3 + G-wrap 0.9.8 patches

Derek Atkins writes: Dave Peticolas [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I have added the patch to the devel tree and placed the patched version of g-wrap.m4 in acinclude.m4. In the long run, though, g-wrap.m4 should be picked up from the installation of g-wrap, I think. It is, at