"Phillip Shelton" writes:
>
> ACCOUNT
> ---
> account_guidchar32
> parent_account_guid char32 -> account.account_guid
> group_guid char32 -> account_group.group_guid
> account_typeinteger ->
Dave Peticolas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Currently, the reconcile dialog is all-or-nothing. Either you finish
> the reconciliation, or nothing is changed. Here is my plan for postponing
> a reconciliation:
Once again, Dave plans to implement something I hadn't even fully
realized I *really*
ACCOUNT
---
account_guidchar32
parent_account_guid char32 -> account.account_guid
group_guid char32 -> account_group.group_guid
account_typeinteger ->
account_types.acct_type_code
account_co
It's been rumoured that Rob Browning said:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> > I don't think there are any. Virtually all sql db's support a
> > common basic set of functions, and its hard for me to think of a
> > good example where gnucash would need/want to use something that
> > wasn't stand
OK, here's the dope:
I don't think rob is entirely aware of the possibilities that his XML
file format opens up. Some of the readers of this mailing list may
also not be aware of what demos grib has done with embedding guppi
in html. I don't know how many people are aware that the cvs branch
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> I don't think there are any. Virtually all sql db's support a
> common basic set of functions, and its hard for me to think of a
> good example where gnucash would need/want to use something that
> wasn't standard.
Say we decide we need to always perform some particu
David Merrill writes:
> >
> > In the past yes, but now they are set to the date you choose
> > in the 'reconciliation info' window that pops up when you
> > start a reconciliation. By default, it is the current date.
>
> So when you go back to complete a reconciliation the date will already
> be
It's been rumoured that Rob Browning said:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> > at some point or another, gnc-engine must convert whatever its doing
> > to plain-old SQL statements. The standard sql client side libraries
> > just send these to the server via unix-dmoain sockets or tcp sockets.
David Merrill writes:
> On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 10:21:30AM -0600, Bill Gribble wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 09:58:25AM -0500, David Merrill wrote:
> > > So an account group can belong to another account group? The current
> > > schema doesn't provide for that. Should it? If it does, then we
It's been rumoured that Jean-David Beyer said:
> > More accurately
> >
> > (sql server) || <- - - - - -> || (sql-client-lib <-> gnc_engine <-> ui)
> >
> > at some point or another, gnc-engine must convert whatever its doing
> > to plain-old SQL statements. The standard sql client side librarie
It's been rumoured that Derek Atkins said:
>
> The problem is that using TCP sockets is completely insecure. This is
> also a problem with Xlib (which is why many people tunnel X in SSH :)
> We want to avoid over-the-network communications in-the-clear, by
> using encryption. I would also like
It's been rumoured that Jean-David Beyer said:
>
> Patrick Spinler wrote:
> >
> > Earlier in this converstation, Linas mentioned that SSLizing any
> > application isn't very difficult.
> >
> > Certainly for the [GPL, I assume you mean] license databases that we're
> > considering using here
> >
Right now you can't really enter a stock split/merger into gnucash
reasonably, and with Dave's help, I'd like to fix that.
He and I (and Bill) have talked about this for a bit, and I've thought
about it for a bit, and I've come up with this proposal.
stock splits/mergers:
=
Patrick Spinler wrote:
>
> Derek Atkins wrote:
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> >
> > > ?
> > > More accurately
> > >
> > > (sql server) || <- - - - - -> || (sql-client-lib <-> gnc_engine <-> ui)
> > >
>
> Earlier in this converstation, Linas mentioned that SSLizing any
> application isn't ve
Derek Atkins wrote:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> > ?
> > More accurately
> >
> > (sql server) || <- - - - - -> || (sql-client-lib <-> gnc_engine <-> ui)
> >
Earlier in this converstation, Linas mentioned that SSLizing any
application isn't very difficult.
Certainly for the license databas
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> at some point or another, gnc-engine must convert whatever its doing
> to plain-old SQL statements. The standard sql client side libraries
> just send these to the server via unix-dmoain sockets or tcp sockets.
> If its tcp sockets, you don't 'care' wheere the sql se
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> It's been rumoured that Rob Browning said:
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> >
> > > > > (server) || <- - - - - -> || (gnc_engine <-> ui)
> > >
> > > here, the dotted line is just sql. Don't have to invent anything to
> > > make this work.
> >
> > But is this
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> ?
> More accurately
>
> (sql server) || <- - - - - -> || (sql-client-lib <-> gnc_engine <-> ui)
>
> at some point or another, gnc-engine must convert whatever its doing
> to plain-old SQL statements. The standard sql client side libraries
I'm not convinced that "g
It's been rumoured that Rob Browning said:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> > > > (server) || <- - - - - -> || (gnc_engine <-> ui)
> >
> > here, the dotted line is just sql. Don't have to invent anything to
> > make this work.
>
> But is this sufficient? Overstating things a bit, this
Guppi rpms are available on ftp.gnucash.org/pub/guppi
dave
___
gnucash-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.gnumatic.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > > (server) || <- - - - - -> || (gnc_engine <-> ui)
>
> here, the dotted line is just sql. Don't have to invent anything to
> make this work.
But is this sufficient? Overstating things a bit, this may rely on
every sql server we support being able to do every
lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> can gnucash be used at moment ( ever? ) in way similar to
> quicken,,,in that I don't have to deal with double entry..i believe
> I understand its usefullness but for my sm business it seems
> overkill..
Not precisely, but you can just create a few misc accounts
David Merrill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> That's not terribly hard to implement, but we need to decide now. It
> would be very hard to change once implemented and in production. My
> design now does not allow for this, per comments from other folks.
As I mentioned in another mail, I kinda thin
On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 10:21:30AM -0600, Bill Gribble wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 09:58:25AM -0500, David Merrill wrote:
> > So an account group can belong to another account group? The current
> > schema doesn't provide for that. Should it? If it does, then we have
> > account groups which
On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 09:58:25AM -0500, David Merrill wrote:
> So an account group can belong to another account group? The current
> schema doesn't provide for that. Should it? If it does, then we have
> account groups which can contain other account groups or accounts. the
> sub-groups can con
On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 10:18:01AM -0500, Derek Atkins wrote:
> David Merrill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I'm going to use lots of GUIDs.
>
> A GUID is just a unique index into a table, right? So an account_guid
> would be an index to a particular account, etc.
Exactly.
--
The great se
David Merrill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm going to use lots of GUIDs.
A GUID is just a unique index into a table, right? So an account_guid
would be an index to a particular account, etc.
-derek
--
Derek Atkins, SB '93 MIT EE, SM '95 MIT Media Laboratory
Member, MIT Stude
On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 09:58:25AM -0500, David Merrill wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 08:43:18AM -0600, Bill Gribble wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 11:57:47AM +1000, Phillip Shelton wrote:
> > > An account group is just what it sounds like, a group of accounts.
> > >
> > > All accounts in
On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 08:43:18AM -0600, Bill Gribble wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 11:57:47AM +1000, Phillip Shelton wrote:
> > An account group is just what it sounds like, a group of accounts.
> >
> > All accounts in an account group must be denominated in the same commodity.
>
> I know t
On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 03:09:50PM +1000, Phillip Shelton wrote:
> Depends on how you use groupings. Are we going to allow someone to have an
> account that is part of credit and part of clothes, part of sport, part of
> hobbies ...
>
> There was a question some time ago about being able to get a
On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 11:57:47AM +1000, Phillip Shelton wrote:
> An account group is just what it sounds like, a group of accounts.
>
> All accounts in an account group must be denominated in the same commodity.
I know the attribution is screwy there but I just want to point out
that in gnucas
31 matches
Mail list logo
