It's been rumoured that Derek Atkins said:
I would also warn you that if you split the CGI, you then completely
lose the benefits of any security, unless you pass the security
metadata across from one program to the other.
???
A common way of providing 'security' with http/cgi is to
to give
It's been rumoured that [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
It should be clear why Transaction engine and DB engine should stay close;
they will need to communicate quite a lot of data in order to negotiate
the parts that are to be submitted to the GUI. A "for instance" would
be that if the DB does
It's been rumoured that Derek Atkins said:
Just to play devil's advocate let me throw another log on the fire:
what we really want here is a distributed file system.
Before http was invented, these were considered for the web.
Unfortunately, nfs was not secure, and afs was propreitary
too
It's been rumoured that Herbert Thoma said:
Hi!
With the newest cvs version I get a segfault when I
try to import a old data file.
There's a whole variety of core dumps when importing old files
with the current cvs version. Many of these happen when
tryig to generate a report. Others
On Fri, Dec 29, 2000 at 02:12:07PM +1100, Robert Graham Merkel wrote:
Eugene Tyurin writes:
snip
Is this really something a casual user who wants to balance his
checkbook and know how much he spends on beer can bear?
Unless it's totally transparent to them, no. Basically,
On Fri, Dec 29, 2000 at 02:46:51AM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's been rumoured that [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
It should be clear why Transaction engine and DB engine should stay close;
they will need to communicate quite a lot of data in order to negotiate
the parts that are to be
On Fri, Dec 29, 2000 at 03:16:28AM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There's a whole variety of core dumps when importing old files
with the current cvs version. Many of these happen when
tryig to generate a report.
Linas, the segfaults when trying to generate reports are a bug in
gtkhtml.
On Fri, Dec 29, 2000 at 03:09:46AM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(btw, in 'real' accounting systems, the actual balance is stored,
and is not computed on the fly by totalling up all transactions.
In gnucash, we total it on the fly because that was the easier thing
to do at the time.)
In
On Fri, Dec 29, 2000 at 01:56:45PM +1100, Robert Graham Merkel wrote:
Bill, I'm busily working on the pane code, and I need to get the
actual widget from a gnc_report_window and shove it in a container.
How do I do so?
You do it the other way 'round: pass it the container (must be a
Actually, I was looking at RPC/Corba/etc. over TCP, not over UDP. The
I got the impression that you were advocating RPC over UDP.
Possibly a not-unreasonable impression, but that seems to me to be a
too low level perspective to focus on. Better to have a prototype that
works badly, and at
On Fri, Dec 29, 2000 at 12:23:41AM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FLAME
Can we not flame?
Yes, please!
Id like to hear someone give a technical overview of how SOAP handles
events.
I spent last night reading the w3c's SOAP 1.1 spec. Ugh. (Not an
editorial comment, just that reading
Ok, I just built it (and figured out why it wasn't working for you, I
bet). I appears that I needed to downgrade my version of g-wrap,
because it wouldn't build with versions even as recent as 0.9.8. I
reverted back to 0.9.1 and it built fine. So, I've now got an RPM
for you. :)
-derek
It's been rumoured that Derek Atkins said:
Ok, I just built it (and figured out why it wasn't working for you, I
bet). I appears that I needed to downgrade my version of g-wrap,
because it wouldn't build with versions even as recent as 0.9.8. I
reverted back to 0.9.1 and it built fine.
It's been rumoured that David Merrill said:
I'm trying to keep up with the protocol issues here, although it isn't
my strong suit. But for the record, the transport should, imnsho, be
kept separate from the database itself. It is a layer to marshall
requests to the database and return
It's been rumoured that Bill Gribble said:
Linas, the segfaults when trying to generate reports are a bug in
gtkhtml. It's fixed in their CVS version, and (I believe) in the
packages that Jim LewisMoss is distributing.
The proximate problem is that our reports tend to generate totally
It's been rumoured that David Merrill said:
In my design, the database will be maintaining the balance. So does
that mean gnucash will be a 'real' accounting system? ;-)
I haven't seen the schema. Do you store both the 'ledger balance'
and the 'trial balance' (i forget what its called),
It's been rumoured that David Merrill said:
On Fri, Dec 29, 2000 at 02:46:51AM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's been rumoured that [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
It should be clear why Transaction engine and DB engine should stay close;
they will need to communicate quite a lot of
On Fri, Dec 29, 2000 at 11:06:02AM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's been rumoured that David Merrill said:
In my design, the database will be maintaining the balance. So does
that mean gnucash will be a 'real' accounting system? ;-)
I haven't seen the schema. Do you store both the
On Fri, Dec 29, 2000 at 11:38:40AM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's been rumoured that David Merrill said:
On Fri, Dec 29, 2000 at 02:46:51AM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's been rumoured that [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
It should be clear why Transaction engine and DB
It's been rumoured that David Merrill said:
Not with each transaction, which is unwieldy in case of edits. current
balance, cleared balance and reconciled balance are all stored with
the account.
Additionally, there is a checkpointing mechanism, whereby the three
balances are recorded at
I've made my working directory available for browsing so you can all
look at it if you're interested. I had made the design doc available
previously, but there is now getting to be more files, including
actual gasp sql code. Of course it's not the live directory; it's a
copy made hourly from
David Merrill writes:
Yes, I am trying to do it this way if I can. It is decidedly
nontrivial and may not make it into the first release. I am already
becoming rather ruthless about cutting things.
I *do* keep a complete auditing trail, so changes *can* be reversed.
That's very nice. By
On Fri, Dec 29, 2000 at 01:29:12PM -0800, Dave Peticolas wrote:
David Merrill writes:
Yes, I am trying to do it this way if I can. It is decidedly
nontrivial and may not make it into the first release. I am already
becoming rather ruthless about cutting things.
I *do* keep a
David Merrill writes:
On Fri, Dec 29, 2000 at 01:29:12PM -0800, Dave Peticolas wrote:
David Merrill writes:
Yes, I am trying to do it this way if I can. It is decidedly
nontrivial and may not make it into the first release. I am already
becoming rather ruthless about cutting
On Fri, Dec 29, 2000 at 01:57:56PM -0800, Dave Peticolas wrote:
David Merrill writes:
On Fri, Dec 29, 2000 at 01:29:12PM -0800, Dave Peticolas wrote:
David Merrill writes:
Yes, I am trying to do it this way if I can. It is decidedly
nontrivial and may not make it into the first
Bill Gribble writes:
On Fri, Dec 29, 2000 at 01:56:45PM +1100, Robert Graham Merkel wrote:
Bill, I'm busily working on the pane code, and I need to get the
actual widget from a gnc_report_window and shove it in a container.
How do I do so?
You do it the other way 'round:
David Merrill writes:
I know that you mean this sincerely. But we really do need to define
the overall goal/scope of the project. Much has been implied but
fairly little has been actually laid out.
1. Are we going to continue support for the local file store?
I think that depends on the
Bill,
I think we discussed before how I'd like to be able to pass
a popup menu to a report_window. How difficult would this be
to arrange?
Robert Merkel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"We are excited and
Hi David,
Excellent!
It's been rumoured that David Merrill said:
Lets assume we are using onc-rpc (or corba or xml-rpc or soap).
** GUI user uses mouse to highlight transaction for editing.
** xaccTransBeginEdit() sends rpc/iiop/xml message to server.
** GUI user types in payee,
29 matches
Mail list logo