You reported a report with style: multi-line in the transaction
report a little while ago. Nobody has been able to duplicate the
crash, and there wasn't much to go on in the bug report.
Is this crash still happening? Does GnuCash hang totally? Is there
a scheme backtrace?
I'd really like to
Ben,
You're right - fixing the currency printing for cheques,
for full generality, is going to be a major PITA,
and there's no way we can get it into 1.6.
However, for a quick hack to make things work just for
AU users, you can just modify the function number-to-words in
number-to-words.scm.
GnuCash 1.5.x has the ability to print checks. Unfortunately,
it writes out the amounts in words in a US-specific way - for
examples, $234.56 is written out as
Two hundred and thirty-four Dollars 56/100
and $234 is written as
Two hundred and thirty-four Dollars 0/100
on Australian cheques,
On Wed, 30 May 2001 23:06:31 Duarte Loreto wrote:
Hope this helps someone. I can look at the scheme file and see how it
could work in portuguese, although I promisse nothing as I never coded
in scheme nor C.
Do you know perl? Python? Basic? Pseudocode?
If you can code a little
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Wednesday 30 May 2001 00:15, Robert Graham Merkel wrote:
on Australian cheques, the equivalent amount would be written
as:
Two hundred and thirty-four dollars and fifty-six cents
and $234 would be written
Two hundred and thirty-four dollars only
In
I giveup, I don't know. Maybe someone on te list can help.
You should remind the list what version of redhat/whatever you have
isntalled, and what version of gnucash.
--linas
- Forwarded message from Ken Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
From: Ken Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Linas Vepstas
On Mon, May 28, 2001 at 01:58:10PM +0100, Malcolm Locke was heard to remark:
After a recent re-install I discovered that I can no longer read my files
from last year. It turns out that I had been using a 1.3 version, so it
is obviously my fault if I cannot get out of this situation.
What I
On Thu, 31 May 2001 10:03:29 Duarte Loreto wrote:
I think it woul be easier to do the code than explain the grammar... ;)
OK. By weekend, I can send you a Java class that gets a number and
returns
the string. The languages I'm better at (or least worse) are Java and VB.
My
current
