Hi.
I've recently posted Bug 310102. What is the procedure of fixing it?
All the best.
--
Kostik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Эта часть сообщения подписана цифровой подписью
___
gnucash-devel mailing list
gnucash-devel@gnucash.o
First tarball now available - needs v.latest QOF CVS.
http://code.neil.williamsleesmill.me.uk/cashutil.tar.gz
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/#cashutil
Doxygen output: http://code.neil.williamsleesmill.me.uk/cashutil/
Note: This is not a formal release and the tarball is not signed. Feel free t
Hi,
It's unlikely this will be fixed before the g2 port is finished.. It IS likely
that the g2 port will fix this all by itself. The procedure of fixing it is to
send in a patch that fixes it, or be patient and wait for someone to get to it.
Just keep in mind that there are bugs that have been
Thanks for explaination.
I would have to become expert in gnucash code to make patch, hehe.
No luck today :).
All the best.
В Вто, 12/07/2005 в 11:26 -0400, Derek Atkins пишет:
> Hi,
>
> It's unlikely this will be fixed before the g2 port is finished.. It IS
> likely
> that the g2 port will f
Your other option is to try the g2 branch and see if it works for you.
If not, then we definitely have work to do. If it DOES work then you
know you just need to wait for g2. This shouldn't require becomming
an expert in gnucash code to make a patch; it only requires enough
knowledge to download
I must admit that I haven't had the time to read through all
of this. I'm not sure if it's something that should be part
of gnucash or not. part of me thinks "yes" and part of me thinks
"no"..
If it's really targetting at gnucash users, to provide a CLI
to adding new items, then it might well
Derek Atkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Your other option is to try the g2 branch and see if it works for you.
> If not, then we definitely have work to do. If it DOES work then you
> know you just need to wait for g2. This shouldn't require becomming
> an expert in gnucash code to make a pat
Quoting Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Would it be a sensible thing to do this and prepare a Debian package
> in the Debian "experimental" archive? It might end up getting more
> use. If it's the right stage of development for that, I'm happy to
> give it a shot.
>
> (I probably wou
On Tuesday 12 July 2005 6:17 pm, Derek Atkins wrote:
> If it's really targetting at gnucash users, to provide a CLI
> to adding new items, then it might well deserve to be part of
> gnucash.
This will be 100% targetted at GnuCash users - yet how many users will use it
regularly? Also, it can be m
On Tuesday 12 July 2005 9:55 pm, you wrote:
Please CC: the list - I'm assuming this was meant for the devel list.
> I most certainly will.
>
> I'm a programmer/sysadmin. I like to write my own methods to output the
> data any which way I want, sort it any which way I want, organize, etc.
You m
On Tue, 2005-07-12 at 22:47 +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
> However, don't get the impression that there are Perl bindings or Java
> methods
> available - the most we'll have even with G2 is generic XML:
> http://code.neil.williamsleesmill.me.uk/qsf.html
>
Are Java bindings wanted ? I am willing t
For the record, I responded to Neil offline on purpose. I do _not_ desire a
direct API to business logic, I was simply responding informally to Neil's
comment below.
Dan W.
On Tue, Jul 12, 2005 at 09:37:01PM +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
> On Tuesday 12 July 2005 6:17 pm, Derek Atkins wrote:
> >
12 matches
Mail list logo
