On Sun, 2006-05-07 at 01:37 +0200, Joern Schauermann wrote:
I compiled GnuCash 1.9.5 and cannot save data (url is alwas prepended
with home directory).
Um, a bit more detail is needed...
Where are you trying to save? What's the error message you get? Is
there anything printed on the
Hi
I'm trying to build gnucash 1.9.5 from source but I get an error (shown
below). Configure completed without error. System details are:
uname says:
Linux sparc64 2.4.32-sparc #1 SMP Mon Dec 12 17:18:03 GMT 2005 sparc64
sun4u TI UltraSparc II (BlackBird) GNU/Linux
Gnome version: 2.12.3
Guile
Hi,
Here is my output from 'make check.' It failed on only one
test. This is on Ubuntu Dapper beta 6.06, gcc 4.0.3, glib
2.10.2, guile 1.6.7. Let me know if this is helpful.
Thanks,
Bernie
Bernie du Breuil (603) 643-9809H
Upper Valley Peace Justice Group
I was looking on the wiki for things to help with and I saw art as one
of the options.
I wondered what art needs work.
I've read the previous comments about splash screens, and thought I'd
offer one.
www.impressusart.com/download/gnucash_splash.png
It's in keeping with the current one's
On Sat, May 06, 2006 at 01:40:52AM -0500, Joshua Facemyer / Impressus Art wrote:
I was looking on the wiki for things to help with and I saw art as one
of the options.
I wondered what art needs work.
I've read the previous comments about splash screens, and thought I'd
offer one.
Quoting Chris Lyttle [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Josh Sled wrote:
I propose the following schedule:
- 1.9.6 release today/tomorrow/Tue... (ultimately it'll be decided
by the tests passing).
- Weekly RC's until release, thus...
- 2.0.0-rc1 on 14 May
- 2.0.0-rc2 (or 2.0.0) on 21 May
-
On Sun, 2006-05-07 at 17:30 -0400, Derek Atkins wrote:
I'd prefer the rc tarballs to continue to be 1.9.x, if you don't mind.
I don't care what they're called ... only that they're actually RCs.
Specifically, we're intentionally not making any commits after some
point.
--
...jsled
On Sat, 2006-05-06 at 11:52 -0400, Derek Atkins wrote:
PS: word from Linas is that 20,000 homes still are without power, so
no word on when it will be restored. Hopefully this weekend.
Looks like it's back up, as of the last hour or so.
--
...jsled
http://asynchronous.org/ - `a=jsled;
On Sat, May 06, 2006 at 02:01:16AM -0400, David Hampton wrote:
Modified: gnucash/trunk/lib/libqof/qof/qofutil.c
===
--- gnucash/trunk/lib/libqof/qof/qofutil.c2006-05-06 01:27:40 UTC (rev
13925)
+++
On Sat, May 06, 2006 at 05:10:01PM -0400, David Hampton wrote:
Modified: gnucash/trunk/lib/libqof/qof/qofutil.c
===
--- gnucash/trunk/lib/libqof/qof/qofutil.c2006-05-06 14:53:22 UTC (rev
13930)
+++
On Sun, 2006-05-07 at 22:07 -0400, Chris Shoemaker wrote:
Why is this after the on_free case?
So that deleting the blank transaction will not cause the collection to
be dirtied.
Deleting an object will result
in calling qof_commit_edit_part2() with do_free set, so this
On Sun, 2006-05-07 at 22:18 -0400, Chris Shoemaker wrote:
On Sat, May 06, 2006 at 05:10:01PM -0400, David Hampton wrote:
Modified: gnucash/trunk/lib/libqof/qof/qofutil.c
===
--- gnucash/trunk/lib/libqof/qof/qofutil.c
Quoting Josh Sled [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Sun, 2006-05-07 at 17:30 -0400, Derek Atkins wrote:
I'd prefer the rc tarballs to continue to be 1.9.x, if you don't mind.
I don't care what they're called ... only that they're actually RCs.
Specifically, we're intentionally not making any commits
13 matches
Mail list logo
