Re: Debit and Creadit in Assets

2006-07-21 Thread Mark Johnson
See the FAQ: http://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/FAQ#Q:_What_are_debits_and_credits.3F Mark Christos Gentsis wrote: >Hello > >I use the Gnucash 2.0.0 and i found out that in the assets, the credit >and debit fields are in the other way around. More specific, then in a >income account you credit some mo

Questions on v2.0 for Help rework

2006-07-21 Thread Dave Herman
I have a couple of questions while working on the "custom" section of the HELP. 1) What does "Renumber subaccount" do? 2) What does "Reset Warnings" in the Action Menus do? 3) Where is the text that is displayed as additional help in the "setting preferences" windows? I would like to use some of

Re: [RFC] QOF Policy: sourceforge-qof is forked; no special lib/libqof policy needed anymore

2006-07-21 Thread Derek Atkins
A few of us discussed this on IRC today. The executive summary: * QOF has forked and we can/should just ignore what happens in QOF-CVS. Indeed, we might even just want to move lib/libqof/qof -> src/qof in our source tree to make it more clear. * We should keep goffice/libgsf as long as it's

Re: Debit and Creadit in Assets

2006-07-21 Thread Josh Sled
On Fri, 2006-07-21 at 15:22 +0300, Christos Gentsis wrote: > I use the Gnucash 2.0.0 and i found out that in the assets, the credit > and debit fields are in the other way around. More specific, then in a > income account you credit some money the total of the account should > increase (this is wha

Debit and Creadit in Assets

2006-07-21 Thread Christos Gentsis
Hello I use the Gnucash 2.0.0 and i found out that in the assets, the credit and debit fields are in the other way around. More specific, then in a income account you credit some money the total of the account should increase (this is what happens), in expenses account then you debit then the tota

Re: [RFC] QOF Policy: sourceforge-qof is forked; no special lib/libqof policy needed anymore

2006-07-21 Thread Christian Stimming
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Developers, now that 2.0 is released, we could pick up and finally close the old issue from January/February. At the time, the question was whether the code in gnucash's lib/libqof should be treated any different compared to any other code in the gnuc