On Sat, 2007-06-16 at 20:05 -0400, Josh Sled wrote:
> Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> It's the second of those two interpretations. And it's
> >> only a problem for people using scheduled transactions.
> >
> > Ok, then next question. What exactly happens if a user tries to lo
The plan for qif importer is as follows and suggestions/guidance is welcome!
The following flow(taken from the qif documentation) has to be followed for
the QIF importer. It is the same(almost) in respect to what happens
presently except the way it will be implemented.
Action
Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> It's the second of those two interpretations. And it's
>> only a problem for people using scheduled transactions.
>
> Ok, then next question. What exactly happens if a user tries to load a
> new-format file into an old gnucash?
It will generica
> It's the second of those two interpretations. And it's
> only a problem for people using scheduled transactions.
Ok, then next question. What exactly happens if a user tries to load a
new-format file into an old gnucash?
Thomas
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message
On Sat, Jun 16, 2007 at 02:06:53PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
>
> > *DATA FILE NOTICE* If you are using Scheduled Transactions, the data
> > file saved by GnuCash 2.1.2 and higher is *NOT* backward-compatible with
> > GnuCash 2.0 anymore. Please make a safe backup of your 2.0 data before
> *DATA FILE NOTICE* If you are using Scheduled Transactions, the data
> file saved by GnuCash 2.1.2 and higher is *NOT* backward-compatible with
> GnuCash 2.0 anymore. Please make a safe backup of your 2.0 data before
> upgrading to 2.1.2.
This kind of announcement is extremely problematic fr
GnuCash 2.1.4 released
The GnuCash development team proudly announces GnuCash 2.1.4 aka
"Release Candidate 1", the first release candidatefor the upcoming 2.2.0
stable release of the GnuCash Open Source Accounting Software. With this
new release series, GnuCash is available on Microsoft Wi
Am Samstag, 16. Juni 2007 09:07 schrieb Nathan Buchanan:
> > > What do we do with our release plans for a 2.2.0 release? We planned
> > > that release for the upcoming weekend [1], but currently the
> > > development has slowed significantly. Even more importantly, the PR
> > > Planning [2] has mad
On 6/15/07, Beth Leonard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 12:21:25PM +0200, Christian Stimming wrote:
> > What do we do with our release plans for a 2.2.0 release? We planned
> > that release for the upcoming weekend [1], but currently the
> > development has slowed significan
