Re: SQL Backend?

> That's right; each backend is basically stand-alone. Of course it shares a > rough outline with the runtime object model and XML data-model, just by > nature. Hmm, I'm a little confused now. The code referenced earlier had to do with GDM, right? And GDM was replaced by QOF? Or is it that they t

Re: Some Japanese translation: ja.po

"Hiroto Kagotani" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hello, > > I'm interested in using GnuCash in Japanese. > I've just subscribed to this list and known someone is also interested > in Japanese translation. Here I attach my first attempt of translation, > though it is not completed yet at all. Grea

Re: autopackage [was: Hi Guys]

Daniel James <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Just wondering if it would be possible for you guys to > provide .autopackage files for gnucash for linux. I do plan on > downloading and compiling anyway, but I'd love it if I could just > double-click ;) (You might want to be careful with your subject l

Hi Guys

Just wondering if it would be possible for you guys to provide .autopackage files for gnucash for linux. I do plan on downloading and compiling anyway, but I'd love it if I could just double-click ;) Thanks for reading, hope I haven't wasted too much time! Daniel

FAQ update: request for help

The FAQ has a bit of cruft, and hasn't really gained a bunch of new items that we've seen with the 2.2 and even the 2.0 releases. I sketched out a set of new FAQ entries. I'm looking for review of things I might have missed, as well, as help in generating the c

Re: updated gnucash's french translation : fr.po

Christian Stimming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> One question: >> #. %s is the name of the weekday >> #: ../src/engine/FreqSpec.c:829 >> #, c-format >> msgid "Bi-Weekly, %ss" >> >> If second 's' is here to use the plural form, could you add a comment >> for translators? > > Oops. @jsled: If this s

Re: data file differences in 2.2

"Hale Boyes, Kevin " <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > So, I'd say that once you've saved your data file in 2.2.0 you should > not go back to 2.0.5 and save there. This has nothing to do with the > data file change noted in the release notes (around scheduled > transactions). Yea ... we should obviou

Re: SQL Backend?

"Albert Lash" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Am I correct in my assumption that this code isn't actually used with > the current, non-SQL, backend? That's right; each backend is basically stand-alone. Of course it shares a rough outline with the runtime object model and XML data-model, just by n

RE: data file differences in 2.2

Hale Boyes, Kevin wrote: > Derek Atkins wrote: >> Kevin HaleBoyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >>> I did notice one other thing. 2.0 doesn't know about the ROOT >>> account type so it changes the type to NO_TYPE. I'm wondering how >>> 2.2 will respond to that? Haven't tried it yet. >> >> W

Re: dogtail test suite test harness

ahmad sayed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Josh Said: >> you suggested some approach like Junit, I tried pyunit and it looks nice to >> me, do you have any issues regarding using it to organize our test cases. >> It looks like you've started down that path. Whatever you're comfortable >> using i

Re: XPF Currency fix

Am Montag, 23. Juli 2007 21:25 schrieb Dominique Corbex: > Hi: > > The XPF currency [CFP Franc Pacifique], used in French Polynesia, > New Caledonia, Wallis and Futuna islands has 2 digits after the decimal > point in Gnucash. > > That's wrong as the XPF currency makes no use of cents. > (see http:

RE: data file differences in 2.2

Derek Atkins wrote: > Kevin HaleBoyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> I did notice one other thing. 2.0 doesn't know about the ROOT >> account type so it changes the type to NO_TYPE. I'm wondering how >> 2.2 will respond to that? Haven't tried it yet. > > What version of 2.0.x are you using

Re: data file differences in 2.2

Kevin HaleBoyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I tested it out - using a 2.2 saved file in the 2.0 version. I noticed that > the > display shows the Root account and it now prefixes all account names. > Visually not great but whatever. Right. > I did notice one other thing. 2.0 doesn't know ab