On 12/09/2007 06:41 PM Josh Sled wrote:
> Josh Sled <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Well, if you haven't filed one yet, don't bother ... but let me know if
> r16629 resolves the problem, please?
Josh,
I just noticed that there might be a new bug that got introduced to the SX
with the version R1662
Phil Longstaff wrote:
> The attached patch (from svn diff) adds GObject property definitions
> to the gnc_commodity object.
>
Couple of notes:
The usage_count field of the gnc_commodity structure (exposed by your
patch as PROP_REFCOUNT) is an internal field for bookkeeping and
shouldn't be expos
--On December 25, 2007 9:45:31 AM -0500 Derek Atkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Hi,
Quoting Mike Alexander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Is Gnucash (as of r16711) supposed to work with Guile 1.8.3?
Macports
I don't think it's ever been tested. It's known to have some issues
with the combination of
I appreciate the further information on this. I didn't understand fully the
context of the term's appearance in this thread, and if it really only appears
under the hood, then that's fine. I *thought* I had seen the term somewhere
else in GnuCash on my own, but probably that was the egg nog...
Dav
Builds fine for me. (gzip isn't a problem)
Nathan
On Dec 18, 2007 10:10 AM, Josh Sled <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Josh Sled <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Author: jsled
> > Date: 2007-12-18 09:57:12 -0500 (Tue, 18 Dec 2007)
> > New Revision: 16678
> > Trac: http://svn.gnucash.org/trac/changese
Hi,
Over this weekend I implemented a simple book closing feature
that lets you zeroize the Income and Expense accounts into
Equity. It's comprised of changesets r16713, 16714, and 16715.
It's only impemented in the trunk branch at the moment.
Please test and comment and let me know if you find
Am Montag, 24. Dezember 2007 12:45 schrieb Herbert Thoma:
> >> 26.
> >> #.src/report/standard-reports/cash-flow.scm
> >> #: ../intl-scm/guile-strings.c:1352
> >> #, c-format
> >> msgid "%s - %s to %s for"
> >>
> > I've just looked up for myself in the source: This is the title string of
> > the rep
Quoting Phil Longstaff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I have a question about the tax tables in the business module. struct
> _book_info contains a GList* tables to contain a list of the tax
> tables. Items are added and removed from the list, and the list is
> freed, but I don't see where the list is c
Am Mittwoch, 26. Dezember 2007 14:15 schrieb Derek Atkins:
> Except they are not transaction ids. They are the GUIDs of
> Check Format configurations. This messages would only come up
> if the user is installing their own (or third-party) check
> formats, so I think using the term GUID here is pe
I have a question about the tax tables in the business module. struct
_book_info contains a GList* tables to contain a list of the tax
tables. Items are added and removed from the list, and the list is
freed, but I don't see where the list is created. _GncTaxTableCreate()
creates the _book_i
Derek Atkins wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Phil Longstaff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>> Do I have commit access for trunk? For changes which would make the
>> gda backend easier (e.g. further work on converting engine objects to be
>> GObject based), I would prefer to make the change in the trunk an
Hi,
Phil Longstaff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Do I have commit access for trunk? For changes which would make the
> gda backend easier (e.g. further work on converting engine objects to be
> GObject based), I would prefer to make the change in the trunk and then
> merge into the GDA branc
The attached patch (from svn diff) adds GObject property definitions to
the gnc_commodity object.
Phil
Index: src/engine/gnc-commodity.c
===
--- src/engine/gnc-commodity.c (revision 16730)
+++ src/engine/gnc-commodity.c (working cop
Except they are not transaction ids. They are the GUIDs of
Check Format configurations. This messages would only come up
if the user is installing their own (or third-party) check
formats, so I think using the term GUID here is perfectly
appropriate.
-derek
"David T." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> write
I'd like to note that using 'GUID' is highly jargonesque (?). I would recommend
a more human-friendly term. Perhaps "Transaction ID"?
David
--- Christian Stimming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Clytie,
>
> Am Mittwoch, 19. Dezember 2007 07:23 schrieb Clytie Siddall:
> > I have just translated
15 matches
Mail list logo
