Hi Andreas,

I just wanted to ask if somebody is already working on the AqBanking 3
port when I read your mail.

Since I have never done any development work for GnuGash and AqBanking
and also have only limited time it will definitely take some time until
it will be done. But I had the impression that until now nobody is
working on it and it needs to be done sooner or later...

But if you accept the challenge that would probably lead to an
earlierer result since you have at least experience with GnuCash
development in contrast to me.

Would it make sense if I nevertheless start to familiarised myself with
the sources? Would it be possible to share the workload? 

Regards,
Manfred

Andreas Köhler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb am Mon, 17 Mar 2008 23:47:30
+0100:

> Hi Christian,
> 
> I wonder whether the attached patch is correct and can be applied.
> 
> Additionally, do you think it is sensible that I as (aq) newbie try to
> invest some time on the AqBanking 3 port?  I suppose that, unless the
> patch becomes too large or even excludes AqBanking 2, the results of
> that port, if someone actually finishes it, are to be backported to
> branches/2.2?  I would mark this one BP then to lessen cluttering and
> ease merges.
> 
> Thanks,
> -- andi5
> 
> 
> PS: Cmake will probably have to wait until I have nothing better to do
> again ;-)
> 
> 


-- 
________________________________________________________________________
 Manfred Usselmann                            [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_______________________________________________
gnucash-devel mailing list
gnucash-devel@gnucash.org
https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel

Reply via email to