On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 11:28 PM, Nathan Buchanan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On 7/19/08, Charles Day <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> I'm going to go ahead and throw out another proposal for comments. I'm
>> calling this RFC2. Unless specifically stated, all that follows refers to
>> transac
-Original Message-
>From: Jerry Jaskierny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Jul 18, 2008 4:24 AM
>To: gnucash-devel@gnucash.org
>Subject: Gnucash triage
>
>With what frequency do Gnucash bugs get Triaged?
>http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=543049 appears to stop
>users (including myself)
Charles,
What impact would your proprosal have on reports?
Alex
> Message: 13
> Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2008 05:52:05 -0700
> From: "Charles Day" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: RFC2: Date/Time proposal
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: GnuCash Devel
> Message-ID:
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Conten
On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 10:53 AM, J. Alex Aycinena <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Charles,
>
> What impact would your proprosal have on reports?
>
None, if you don't enter transactions posting times. Entering transaction
times would cause those few reports that show individual transactions or
split
Any news on a 2.2.6 release date?
For my part, you may have noticed my avalanche of changes to the QIF
Importer since 2.2.5. I now consider it to be "done", at least for a while.
So I am washing my hands of it for now, unless new bugs are reported.
Cheers,
Charles
On 7/19/08, Charles Day <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 11:28 PM, Nathan Buchanan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 7/19/08, Charles Day <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm going to go ahead and throw out another proposal for comments. I'm
>>> calling this RFC2. U
I should probably wait for Andreas's response, but I think 2.2.6 is in
planning for the next week or so.
Nathan
On 7/19/08, Charles Day <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Any news on a 2.2.6 release date?
>
> For my part, you may have noticed my avalanche of changes to the QIF
> Importer since 2.2.5.
