Donald Allen writes:
>> (cond ((> x 5) (fun a b))) ;; I won't even attempt to properly indent this
>> in gmail
>>
>> vs.
>>
>> if x > 5:
>>
>
> I'm not sure how I fat-fingered this, but the message got sent prematurely,
> destroying my credibility:-)
>
> Anyway, you get my point -- writing that c
On Wed, 24 Aug 2011 14:32:16 +0200, Florian Haas wrote:
>
> Some existing account hierarchies (in the de_DE locale) presently work
> around this limitation rather crudely, by including the account number
> as a prefix to the account name. Apart from that being a rather
> inelegant redundancy, it a
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 9:46 AM, Donald Allen wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 9:27 AM, Hendrik Boom wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 09 Jul 2011 18:05:48 -0400, Yawar Amin wrote:
>>
>> > Hi John,
>> >
>> > On 2011-07-08, at 23:33, John Ralls wrote:
>> >
>> >>> […]
>> >>
>> >> Fun. Two questions: Can that
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 9:27 AM, Hendrik Boom wrote:
> On Sat, 09 Jul 2011 18:05:48 -0400, Yawar Amin wrote:
>
> > Hi John,
> >
> > On 2011-07-08, at 23:33, John Ralls wrote:
> >
> >>> […]
> >>
> >> Fun. Two questions: Can that be easily converted into a string parser
> >> so that normal users are
On Sat, 09 Jul 2011 18:05:48 -0400, Yawar Amin wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> On 2011-07-08, at 23:33, John Ralls wrote:
>
>>> […]
>>
>> Fun. Two questions: Can that be easily converted into a string parser
>> so that normal users aren't put off by the extra parentheses,
>
> I guess we could replace al
