On Thu, Dec 29, 2005 at 11:41:14PM -0500, David Hampton wrote:
> > Interestingly, the only g-wrap function that complained about the
> > new const function arguments was xaccAccountOrder(), the only one
> > using const Account ** types. It seems very uncommon to express
> > const-ness in g-wrap fo
On Fri, Dec 30, 2005 at 07:21:22AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello,
>
> With that version I have found the following strings missing in the po
> file, and made the program crash as well.
Thank you for testing.
> Click File -> Open -> Budget. In the "select a budget" window:
>
> The foll
On Fri, Dec 30, 2005 at 11:25:03AM -0500, David Hampton wrote:
>
> These new lines will cause warning messages on a gtk2.4 system whenever
> glade tries to instantiate whatever widget they have been added to. I'd
> say you're clearly running a gtk2.6 (or better) system and not the
> target gtk2.4
On Fri, Dec 30, 2005 at 08:20:17PM +0100, Christian Stimming wrote:
> Am Freitag, 30. Dezember 2005 17:00 schrieb Chris Shoemaker:
> > Author: chris
> > Date: 2005-12-30 11:00:05 -0500 (Fri, 30 Dec 2005)
> > New Revision: 12208
> > Trac: http://svn.gnucash.org/trac/
On Fri, Dec 30, 2005 at 02:54:54PM -0500, Derek Atkins wrote:
> Quoting Chris Shoemaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
> >Your brief explanation is better than the glib docs, but I still don't
> >understand what would cause a string marked N_("...") to eventua
David,
I really like the filter by dialog for the accounts page. I
want to use the same thing for the budget page.
Here's my plan for factoring it out:
* typedef and export the "fd" struct as something like "FilterDialog"
* factor the middle chunk out of
gnc_plugin_page_account_tree_
On Fri, Dec 30, 2005 at 04:42:23PM -0500, Chris Shoemaker wrote:
> David,
> I really like the filter by dialog for the accounts page. I
> want to use the same thing for the budget page.
>
> Here's my plan for factoring it out:
>
> * typedef and export the &qu
On Fri, Dec 30, 2005 at 04:42:23PM -0500, Chris Shoemaker wrote:
> [ snip plan for factoring code out of gnc-plugin-page-account-tree ]
>
> If it works there, maybe all
> these callbacks and the dialog creation should move to some
> "gnc_tree_view_account_types" home.
On Sat, Dec 31, 2005 at 12:45:42PM +0100, Christian Stimming wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>
> thanks for this nice work. It's certainly good if common functionality can be
> moved to a place where it belongs even better.
>
> However, I would kindly like to ask that you stick to gnucash's so-far
> convent
On Sat, Dec 31, 2005 at 12:16:59PM -0500, Chris Shoemaker wrote:
>
> I also know that ChangeLog.svn has some deficiencies, like completely
> ruining whitespace and UTF8. Fortunately, those are just deficiencies
> in the script, since SVN actually saves a good log.
Actually, all
On Sun, Jan 01, 2006 at 02:48:22PM +0100, Christian Stimming wrote:
> Am Samstag, 31. Dezember 2005 19:04 schrieb Chris Shoemaker:
> > Actually, all the things I don't like about ChangeLog.svn come from
> > the xslt. The output of svn log -v is actually very useful and the
&
On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 09:44:46PM -0500, David Hampton wrote:
> Author: hampton
> Date: 2006-01-02 21:44:45 -0500 (Mon, 02 Jan 2006)
> New Revision: 12240
> Trac: http://svn.gnucash.org/trac/changeset/12240
>
> Modified:
>gnucash/trunk/ChangeLog
>gnucash/trunk/src/engine/Transaction.c
> L
Folks,
I'm interested in comments on the attached patch. For anyone
unfamiliar with the details... Right now, Gnucash is basically a Guile
program which happens to link to some libraries written in C.
When you run Gnucash, you're actually just starting the guile
interpreter and p
On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 08:06:00AM +, Neil Williams wrote:
> On Tuesday 03 January 2006 6:18 am, Chris Shoemaker wrote:
> > Folks,
> > I'm interested in comments on the attached patch.
>
> I too have been working on a gnucash C executable - but with even l
On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 02:13:15AM -0500, David Hampton wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-01-03 at 01:18 -0500, Chris Shoemaker wrote:
> > I'm interested in comments on the attached patch.
>
> Looks good to me. I just hacked together something similar in an
> attempt to get gprof
On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 11:07:07AM -0500, Derek Atkins wrote:
> Quoting Chris Shoemaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> >On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 08:06:00AM +, Neil Williams wrote:
> >>On Tuesday 03 January 2006 6:18 am, Chris Shoemaker wrote:
> >>> Folks,
>
On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 06:43:00PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello,
>
> With revision 12241
> I got the following error when running make pot:
> make all-am
> make[2]: Entering directory `/home/tortho/svn/gcash/intl-scm'
> make[2]: Nothing to be done for `all-am'.
> make[2]: Leaving direc
On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 03:42:04PM -0500, Derek Atkins wrote:
> Derek Atkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Any chance we could change this slightly.. If
> > ${top_srcdir}/Makefile.am is a symlink, can we follow that symlink and
> > run from there? This would also allow this process to work i
On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 03:58:09PM -0500, Chris Shoemaker wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 03:42:04PM -0500, Derek Atkins wrote:
> > Derek Atkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > Any chance we could change this slightly.. If
> > > ${top_srcdir}/Makef
On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 11:23:01AM +0100, Christian Stimming wrote:
> Neil Williams schrieb:
> >>Does anyone know why we version-control this generated file?
> >
> >make-gnucash-postfiles is made on each make started from ${top_srcdir} and
> >remade if it's deleted, so it should be safe to remove
On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 12:25:31PM -0500, Derek Atkins wrote:
> Quoting Chris Shoemaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> >I thought there was some reason, I just couldn't remember. Instead of
> >reverting, I'll commit a stub po/POTFILES.in explaining why the file
>
On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 06:30:23PM +0100, Christian Stimming wrote:
> Chris Shoemaker schrieb:
> >On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 11:23:01AM +0100, Christian Stimming wrote:
> >
> >>Neil Williams schrieb:
> >>
> >>>>Does anyone know why we version-contro
On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 06:30:23PM +0100, Christian Stimming wrote:
> Chris Shoemaker schrieb:
> >On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 11:23:01AM +0100, Christian Stimming wrote:
> >
> >>Neil Williams schrieb:
> >>
> >>>>Does anyone know why we version-contro
On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 01:01:52PM -0500, Derek Atkins wrote:
> Quoting Chris Shoemaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> >The goal is just to make it so we're not breaking the build or leaving
> >out files if we add/delete/rename files and forget to update
> >POTFILES.i
On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 06:06:27PM +, Neil Williams wrote:
> On Tuesday 03 January 2006 5:43 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > With revision 12241
> > I got the following error when running make pot:
> > make[1]: *** No rule to make target `../src/gnome/gncmod-budget.c', needed
>
On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 08:01:13PM +, Neil Williams wrote:
> On Wednesday 04 January 2006 5:30 pm, Christian Stimming wrote:
> > > I thought there was some reason, I just couldn't remember. Instead of
> > > reverting, I'll commit a stub po/POTFILES.in explaining why the file
> > > is in SVN.
On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 10:30:30PM +0100, Christian Stimming wrote:
> Okay. Now after testing this I agree that auto-generation of po/POTFILES.in
> is
> possible. It is possible because and only because we can rely that "make" in
> the po/ directory is either run by a "make" in the top-level dir
On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 11:32:59PM +, Neil Williams wrote:
> As Derek comments, it is better to have two targets but OSX barffed initially.
>
> I'm checking now if all-local will sort out these differences. (Let you now
> tomorrow - looks OK so far.)
Sorry to be so picky, but what _exactly
On Thu, Jan 05, 2006 at 10:52:18AM -0500, Derek Atkins wrote:
> Quoting Chris Shoemaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> >For that reason (and because I'm hoping ChangeLog will oneday become
> >more automated) I'm not in favor of adding a dependency on ChangeLog.
&
On Thu, Jan 05, 2006 at 11:06:57AM -0500, Josh Sled wrote:
> In the example account hierearchies, it seems that we should encourage
> the creation of placeholder accounts for all the non-leaf accounts ...
> any objections to my changing the datafiles in this way?
I don't know...
Are any groups of
On Thu, Jan 05, 2006 at 12:21:57PM -0500, Derek Atkins wrote:
> Quoting Chris Shoemaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> >"At best"? If I touched ChangeLog as I edited files, like you
> >suggest, I'd constantly be remaking POTFILES.in. How's that for a
> &
I noticed that lib/libgsf-1.12.3 bombs on `make check'.
Does anyone know if this is an artefact of our copying it into our
tree or if it just isn't meant to work?
Should we
a) disable the tests
b) upgrade libgsf
c) debug the libgsf build or
d) something else?
-chris
On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 11:37:26AM -0500, Derek Atkins wrote:
> Chris Shoemaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Thu, Jan 05, 2006 at 12:21:57PM -0500, Derek Atkins wrote:
> >> Quoting Chris Shoemaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >>
> >> >&quo
gog-renderer-cairo.h seems to have escaped the goffice import even though
gog-renderer-cairo.c is present.
This breaks `make dist'. I can import this file from goffice myself,
and obviously, `make dist' doesn't really care what I put there, but I
don't understand the overall integration policy w
On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 03:40:08PM -0500, Josh Sled wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-01-05 at 17:02 -0500, Chris Shoemaker wrote:
> > I noticed that lib/libgsf-1.12.3 bombs on `make check'.
> >
> > Does anyone know if this is an artefact of our copying it into our
> > tree o
On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 03:40:08PM -0500, Josh Sled wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-01-05 at 17:02 -0500, Chris Shoemaker wrote:
> > I noticed that lib/libgsf-1.12.3 bombs on `make check'.
> >
> > Does anyone know if this is an artefact of our copying it into our
> > tree o
On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 06:00:27PM -0500, Josh Sled wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-01-06 at 15:37 -0500, Josh Sled wrote:
> > Reviewing the goffice-0.0.4.tar.bz2 file I used as source for the
> > import, *it* doesn't have that file. Huh. I'm tracking it down
> > presently.
> >
> > Come to think of it, I'
On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 04:14:29PM -0500, Derek Atkins wrote:
> Chris Shoemaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Well, since actually having to `make clean' is annoying, we should
> > certainly do anything easy to avoid it. The dist-hook runs just
> >
On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 05:02:03PM -0500, Derek Atkins wrote:
> I just tried to build from a current SVN tree, a clean checkout
> (effectively), and I got the following spewage from configure:
>
> checking what extra warning flags to pass to the C compiler... -Werror
> -Wdeclaration-after-statem
On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 06:11:59PM -0500, Derek Atkins wrote:
> Quoting Chris Shoemaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> >On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 05:02:03PM -0500, Derek Atkins wrote:
> >>I just tried to build from a current SVN tree, a clean checkout
> >>(effective
On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 06:11:59PM -0500, Derek Atkins wrote:
> Quoting Chris Shoemaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> >On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 05:02:03PM -0500, Derek Atkins wrote:
> >>I just tried to build from a current SVN tree, a clean checkout
> >>(effective
On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 07:25:40PM -0500, Chris Shoemaker wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 06:11:59PM -0500, Derek Atkins wrote:
> > Quoting Chris Shoemaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > >On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 05:02:03PM -0500, Derek Atkins wrote:
> > >&g
On Thu, Jan 05, 2006 at 11:46:51AM -0500, Chris Shoemaker wrote:
> Actually, last time I did it, it was a considerable about of work to
> undo the whitespace damage of the xslt script. It would be almost
> trivial if I could use the format output by `svn log`. Incidentally,
> I
On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 10:51:13PM -0500, Derek Atkins wrote:
> Quoting Chris Shoemaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> >>The attachement is damaged. Seems to contain random newlines and
> >>'!'s.
> >
> >Actually, the damage isn't completely ra
On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 11:35:46PM -0500, Derek Atkins wrote:
> Quoting Chris Shoemaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> >>I sent another copy via another mailer to you personally...
> >
> >That one is undamaged and also identical to mine. Do you still see
> >the
On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 08:51:53AM +, Neil Williams wrote:
> On Sunday 08 January 2006 10:02 pm, Derek Atkins wrote:
> > I just tried to build from a current SVN tree, a clean checkout
> > (effectively), and I got the following spewage from configure:
> >
> > checking what extra warning flags t
The files used for xml testing contain some deprecated tags, like
.
What does it mean when an xml file has both act:commodity and
act:security with different values? It looks like the xml parser
calls xaccAccountSetCommodity in both cases. But the testing routines
don't know how to verify act:s
On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 10:23:43PM +, Neil Williams wrote:
> On Monday 09 January 2006 9:06 pm, Chris Shoemaker wrote:
> > Author: chris
> > Date: 2006-01-09 16:06:45 -0500 (Mon, 09 Jan 2006)
> > New Revision: 12308
> > Trac: http://svn.gnucash.org/trac/chang
Something like this would be a next logical small step for migrating
the startup sequence from scheme to C. I've given this some light
testing with alternate locales and it seems to work for me, but I'm
not very familiar with gettext/intl stuff, so please speak up if this
looks wrong.
-chris
In
[Warning: Long... and probably not as tactful as Christian "this
statement lacks a bit of diplomacy" Stimming. :) ]
Neil,
In the interest of time, let me jump right to what I think is
probably the most fundamental and, perhaps, controversial of several
slightly-related topics:
On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 12:58:14PM +, Neil Williams wrote:
> On Wednesday 11 January 2006 12:08 pm, Christian Stimming wrote:
> > I'm very sorry and you will probably not like it, but I have to
> > fundamentally disagree about your statement here.
>
> :-)
>
> > The code base under lib/libqof/
[oops, reply meant for list, too]
On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 05:56:19PM +, Neil Williams wrote:
> On Wednesday 11 January 2006 5:25 pm, you wrote:
> >
> > I don't think there's a lack of consideration. I think it's just a
> > disagreement about your role. I view your role as a general gnucash
>
On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 06:43:36PM +, Neil Williams wrote:
> On Wednesday 11 January 2006 4:23 pm, you wrote:
> > Should GnuCash use an external QOF library?
>
> At a packaging level:
> Wherever QOF is available, yes.
> Wherever QOF can be made available, also yes.
>
> At development
For now, please configure '--without-qof'.
Please refer the concurrent thread for more details.
-chris
___
gnucash-devel mailing list
gnucash-devel@gnucash.org
https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 08:09:05PM +, Neil Williams wrote:
[snip]
> > > All QOF development happens at SF.
> >
> > You're implying that the gnucash developers have agreed to stop
> > development of the in-tree QOF and develop QOF only in your fork at
> > SF.
>
> It's not a fork. QOF lives at
[Neil, I think you accidentally sent this off-list again. I'm
forwarding it to the list, but just in case it was meant to be
private, I've removed everything except that which I think needs to be
public record.]
On Wednesday 11 January 2006 7:16 pm, you wrote:
> > ? There is no way gnucash can do
On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 10:14:17AM -0500, David Hampton wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-01-11 at 11:31 +0100, Christian Stimming wrote:
>
> > Err... no, that's not correct. gtk_init() as well as gtk_set_locale()
> > initializes internationalization support *for GTK+*. We still need to
> > initialize i18n
On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 11:28:49PM +, Neil Williams wrote:
> On Wednesday 11 January 2006 11:05 pm, Derek Atkins wrote:
> > However, I do want to ask how this distraction is going to help get
> > G2 out the door? And yes, I do consider this is a distraction right now.
>
> Well, if we want a C
On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 04:51:30PM -0500, Chris Shoemaker wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 10:14:17AM -0500, David Hampton wrote:
> > On Wed, 2006-01-11 at 11:31 +0100, Christian Stimming wrote:
> >
> > > Err... no, that's not correct. gtk_init() as well as gtk_se
On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 06:40:46PM -0500, Joshua Sled wrote:
> Author: jsled
> Date: 2006-01-12 18:40:45 -0500 (Thu, 12 Jan 2006)
> New Revision: 12334
> Trac: http://svn.gnucash.org/trac/changeset/12334
>
> Removed:
>gnucash/trunk/lib/goffice-0.0.4/goffice/graph/gog-renderer-cairo.c
> Modifie
On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 09:37:06PM -0500, Chris Shoemaker wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 06:40:46PM -0500, Joshua Sled wrote:
> > Author: jsled
> > Date: 2006-01-12 18:40:45 -0500 (Thu, 12 Jan 2006)
> > New Revision: 12334
> > Trac: http://svn.gnucash.org/trac/chang
On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 10:23:52AM -0500, Derek Atkins wrote:
> Chris Shoemaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > IMO, if we're interested in quieting configure-noise, there are bigger
> > fish to fry, like noise caused by _our_ sloppy code, instead of noise
> > comi
On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 09:55:50PM -0500, Josh Sled wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-01-12 at 21:37 -0500, Chris Shoemaker wrote:
> > 'make dist' now produces a tarball. But the tarball doesn't build
> > because of:
> >
> > #if WITH_GCONF
> > # SUBDIRS
On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 12:36:02AM -0500, Derek Atkins wrote:
> Quoting Chris Shoemaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> >BTW, gnucash now successfully completes `make dist' and `make check'.
> >And it configures, builds and *runs* from a tarball. Some of the
> >
On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 02:03:58PM +, Neil Williams wrote:
> On Friday 13 January 2006 5:36 am, Derek Atkins wrote:
> > Quoting Chris Shoemaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > BTW, gnucash now successfully completes `make dist' and `make check'.
> > >
On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 10:58:24AM -0500, Derek Atkins wrote:
> FYI, I agree 100% with what Chris says here! Wow, Chris, is that
> a first? ;)
Ha! It might be. What worries me is that it's so overcast here at
the moment that I can't check to see if the Sun still shines. But, as
far as I can
[ Please start a new thread when starting a new topic (i.e. don't reply
to an unrelated email.) ]
On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 07:14:06PM +0200, Покотиленко Костик wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm reading this list since Oct 2005 or so.
>
> I finally decided to test GnuCash G2. I've learned SVN, got, compiled
>
On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 08:49:17PM +0100, Thomas Klausner wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 02:47:10PM -0500, Derek Atkins wrote:
> > Hmm.. What about:
> >
> > file:///home/wiz/a
>
> The folder contents could not be displayed
> Error getting information for '/home/wiz/file:/home/wiz':
On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 08:20:56PM +0200, Покотиленко Костик wrote:
> > If not, do you see errors in /tmp/gnucash.trace?
>
> It's saying something nasty, attached
>
> --
> Покотиленко Костик <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> gnucash: failed to open libtool archive "NONE/lib/libqof-backend-qsf.la"
>
> gnc_
On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 03:02:09PM -0500, Chris Shoemaker wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 08:20:56PM +0200, Покотиленко Костик wrote:
> > > If not, do you see errors in /tmp/gnucash.trace?
> >
> > It's saying something nasty, attached
> >
> > --
On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 03:34:12PM -0500, Derek Atkins wrote:
> Chris Shoemaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Our configure.in:
> > if test x$QOF_XML_DIR = x; then
> > QOF_LIB_DIR=`eval echo $libdir | sed "s%^NONE%$prefix%"`
> >
On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 04:04:40PM -0500, Derek Atkins wrote:
> Quoting Chris Shoemaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> >On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 03:34:12PM -0500, Derek Atkins wrote:
> >>Chris Shoemaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >>
> >>> O
On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 04:33:06PM -0500, Derek Atkins wrote:
> Now that we have gnucash-bin, I think we might want to remove
> the (unneeded) gnucash override script.
I think _all_ of the scripts in src/bin/overrides are obsolete, except
maybe gnucash-build-env, which could be moved to src/bin if
On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 10:45:06PM +0100, Thomas Klausner wrote:
> > QOF uses a compile-time path
> > (QOF_LIB_DIR) to find libraries.
>
> This part of the analysis is true.
>
> The problem is (for me) that, while QOF_LIB_DIR is defined properly
> (all Makefiles contain "QOF_LIB_DIR = /home/wiz/g
On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 08:44:29PM -0500, Derek Atkins wrote:
> Quoting Chris Shoemaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> >>Index: src/engine/Makefile.am
> >>===
> >>--- src/engine/Makefile.am (revisio
On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 08:53:48PM -0500, Derek Atkins wrote:
> Modified: gnucash/trunk/configure.in
> ===
> --- gnucash/trunk/configure.in2006-01-13 23:57:36 UTC (rev 12347)
> +++ gnucash/trunk/configure.in2006-01-14 0
On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 09:51:52PM -0500, Derek Atkins wrote:
> Quoting Chris Shoemaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> >According to the autoconf manual (1), "In order to support these
> >features [changing --prefix at make-time, et al.], it is essential
> >th
On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 02:22:42PM -0500, Derek Atkins wrote:
> Quoting Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> >--- gnucash/trunk/src/bin/test/test-version 2006-01-13 17:41:53 UTC
> >(rev 12340)
> >+++ gnucash/trunk/src/bin/test/test-version 2006-01-13 19:12:12 UTC
> >(rev 12341)
> >@@ -1,3 +1
On Sat, Jan 14, 2006 at 06:01:55PM -0500, Derek Atkins wrote:
> As you may have noticed, the server is back up. It's going
> to go down again sometime in the next 24-72 hours so it can
> get relocated, but that downtime will only be about 5-10 minutes.
>
> Please let me know if you notice anythin
On Sun, Jan 15, 2006 at 07:42:58PM -0500, Derek Atkins wrote:
> Quoting Chris Shoemaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> >Thanks for upgrading the server, Derek.
>
> You're welcome. I'm still working out the kinks. I'm also waiting for
> the 2.6.15 kernel to
On Sun, Jan 15, 2006 at 07:00:24PM -0700, Mark Johnson wrote:
> Josh Sled wrote:
>
> >On Sun, 2006-01-15 at 07:48 -0700, Mark Johnson wrote:
> >
> >
> >>That's good news. I'm looking forward to another 'svn update'.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >12357 should resolve this; the New Account Hierarchy druid w
On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 09:32:48PM -0500, Derek Atkins wrote:
> A little more information on this failure...
>
> (gdb) up
> #5 0x00bc1c06 in gtk_radio_action_get_group ()
> from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
> (gdb) up
> #6 0xb7cb852a in gnc_main_window_update_radio_button (window=0xa196380)
>
On Sun, Jan 15, 2006 at 09:22:39PM -0500, Derek Atkins wrote:
> Quoting Chris Shoemaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> >I haven't been able to reproduce this on FC3/x86. Is it still an
> >issue? If so, do you have a reproduction-case for it?
>
> gnucash isn&#
On Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 04:49:32PM +0100, Eskil Bylund wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here's a patch that updates the add/edit account window. Changes are:
>
> * src/gnome/glade/account.glade
> * src/gnome-utils/dialog-account.c: Clean up the Account dialog.
> Replace the account type clist with a GtkComboBo
On Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 11:30:49AM -0500, Derek Atkins wrote:
> Chris,
>
> Quoting Chris Shoemaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> >Hello Eskil,
> >
> > Instead of creating and populating a GtkListStore for the Account
> >types, could you please use the pr
On Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 02:44:29PM -0500, Josh Sled wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-01-16 at 12:08 +0100, Christian Stimming wrote:
>
> > Proposed DRAFT schedule:
> > All dates are the Sunday of a weekend. It is proposed to have a release
> > every three week interval; we might shorten that to shorter inte
On Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 04:21:44PM -0500, Derek Atkins wrote:
>
> Well, Jan 29 is "soon", is it not?
I guess so. So, let's try to get `make distcheck' working by then.
> I agree we should release something
> soon, but we should also keep track of all the known issues..
>
> >As for the first
On Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 08:13:06PM +0100, Christian Stimming wrote:
> Dear Nikos,
>
> thanks for this contribution. Is this for gnucash-1.8.x or for the upcoming
> 1.9.x/2.0.0?
>
> Am Montag, 16. Januar 2006 01:53 schrieb Nikos Charonitakis:
> > Updated Greek po file (more than 100 messages upda
On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 12:47:02AM +0100, Eskil Bylund wrote:
> 2006/1/16, Eskil Bylund <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Here's a patch that updates the add/edit account window. Changes are:
> >
> > * src/gnome/glade/account.glade
> > * src/gnome-utils/dialog-account.c: Clean up the Account d
On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 10:28:17AM +0100, Christian Stimming wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>
> Nikos Charonitakis schrieb:
> Updated Greek po file (more than 100 messages updated)
> >>>
> >>I'm now unable to complete a 'make install':
> >>
> >>make[2]: Entering directory `/home/chris/svn/trunk/po'
> >>fi
On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 11:40:27AM +0100, Christian Stimming wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> My proposal basically gives the "time-based release" idea priority over
> "feature-based release". We could identify a small number of issues that
> *have* to be fixed before the first 1.9.0 (a.k.a. 1.9.0-blockers)
On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 11:54:06AM +0100, Christian Stimming wrote:
> Chris Shoemaker schrieb:
> >>>No objection. How well-maintainted is the bugzilla? Are there some
> >>>bugzilla-masters out there?
> >>
> >>All the committers should have full acces
On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 07:47:22AM -0700, Mark Johnson wrote:
> Josh Sled wrote:
>
> >As the account-tree now allows editing of account-names in place, the
> >account name is (apparently) no longer a reasonable target for
> >double-clicking in order to open the register for that account. I'm not
On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 03:52:13PM +0100, Christian Stimming wrote:
> Chris Shoemaker schrieb:
> >Thanks for that summary. I'm glad we have a couple bugzilla-masters
> >around. I looked at bugzilla yesterday and noticed a bug that could
> >be closed. (test-lots failure
On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 06:20:39PM +0100, Christian Stimming wrote:
> Chris Shoemaker schrieb:
> >>>I looked at bugzilla yesterday and noticed a bug that could
> >>>be closed. (test-lots failure)
> >>
> >>http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=
On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 10:48:40AM -0500, Derek Atkins wrote:
> Ganesan Rajagopal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > gnucash-bin.c:33:25: error: gnc-version.h: No such file or directory
> > cc1: warnings being treated as errors
> > gnucash-bin.c:41: warning: no previous prototype for 'gnucash_comma
On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 08:31:55PM -0500, Derek Atkins wrote:
> Quoting Chris Shoemaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> >+{"rpc-server", '\0', POPT_ARG_NONE, NULL, 0,
> >+ _("Run the RPC Server if GnuCash was configured with
> &g
On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 08:33:16PM -0500, Chris Shoemaker wrote:
> Author: chris
> Date: 2006-01-18 20:33:16 -0500 (Wed, 18 Jan 2006)
> New Revision: 12872
> Trac: http://svn.gnucash.org/trac/changeset/12872
>
> Modified:
>gnucash/trunk/src/scm/command-line.scm
>
On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 02:10:28PM +0100, Eskil Bylund wrote:
> 2006/1/17, Chris Shoemaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > If you want to continue with this, here's what I suggest:
> >
> > 1) move the filter function into gnc-tree-model-account-types.c. I
> > thin
On Thu, Jan 19, 2006 at 10:58:48AM -0500, David Hampton wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-01-19 at 09:16 -0500, Chris Shoemaker wrote:
>
> > Modified: gnucash/trunk/src/gnome/top-level.h
> > ===
> > --- gnucash/tru
301 - 400 of 694 matches
Mail list logo
