On Wed, Dec 22, 2004 at 01:45:07PM -0500, Derek Atkins wrote:
Chris Shoemaker [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ok, well, it doesn't actually work as well as I thought (I was
mistakenly using the installed files). But it's not scm load-path
problems (yet), it's
filename
On Wed, Dec 22, 2004 at 05:05:29PM +, Neil Williams wrote:
On Wednesday 22 December 2004 11:48 am, Chris Shoemaker wrote:
I just make install every time. Note that if you only change
source files (not headers) then you only need to make install
in the directories you've changed
On Thu, Dec 23, 2004 at 12:07:59AM +, Neil Williams wrote:
Make install runs make if anything needs to be updated anyway - it'll bail
out
if there's an error with the make. The only difficulty is if you make an
obvious typo, the relevant error line can be a long way back in the output
Say that I've got the g2 branch checked out and I make a completely
trivial patch, that I wouldn't hesitate to commit, and obviously
belongs on all branches (well, at least HEAD) E.g.:
diff -u -r1.55.4.5 Makefile.am
--- Makefile.am 7 Jul 2004 04:10:25 - 1.55.4.5
+++ Makefile.am 23 Dec
* we don't need to get our own account TreeModel and set it to our
new account TreeView, because gnc_tree_view_account_new gives us a
TreeView with the global account TreeModel already set. Plus, it
already has the right TreeModelSort interface, which we are counting
on.
* check for NULL
Oops. Now with patch.
On Wed, Dec 22, 2004 at 07:34:04PM -0500, Chris Shoemaker wrote:
* we don't need to get our own account TreeModel and set it to our
new account TreeView, because gnc_tree_view_account_new gives us a
TreeView with the global account TreeModel already set. Plus
I found that some instructions in HACKING for running gnucash from the
build dir didn't quite work. Since ./src/bin/overrides/gnucash*
expect that $PATH is already setup, they do stuff like 'exec
gnucash-env ...'. But, ./src/bin/overrides/ (where gnucash-build-env
lives) is not in $PATH, so one
On Sat, Sep 18, 2004 at 06:41:25PM -0400, Derek Atkins wrote:
Chris Shoemaker [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Later, I'll rerun with larger --num-callers.
Oddly, it doesn't SEGV under valgrind. Is that normal?
Yes. Valgrind is going to keep the memory alive so it wont segv...
But yes
On Fri, Sep 17, 2004 at 10:13:11AM -0400, Derek Atkins wrote:
Chris Shoemaker [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Why does removing/commenting out gtk_container_add(GTK_CONTAINER(box),
GTK_WIDGET(dlg-relatedView)); from category_dialog_create(), prevent
the consistent SEGV upon closing
On Thu, Sep 16, 2004 at 11:38:27AM -0400, Derek Atkins wrote:
Hi,
Chris Shoemaker [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I've been using gnucash lightly for several (6?) months now. I'm pretty
impressed with it, but I've always wondered why there wasn't more development
activity. I code for fun
On Thu, Aug 05, 2004 at 06:48:10PM -0400, Chris Shoemaker wrote:
I checked it out, and compiled it.
Here are some initial impressions. I'll look more closely later.
Second look: more comments:
1) In New Budget Category setup, the period column says monthy:10, even
though I selected
Darin, et al.,
I've read the thread(s) regarding budgeting in gnucash. It
seemed that the design was sound and that things were progressing in the
right direction. I was hoping to look more closely at the status. (The
http://www.darin.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/ link is dead.)
I've
On Mon, Aug 02, 2004 at 11:07:48PM -0400, Derek Atkins wrote:
Chris Shoemaker [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
BTW, is there any precedent for patches like this to be placed in some
sort of patches in progress area of CVS? That way, they can be
versioned, easily retrieved, revised, and tested
it to a more
polished state.
Enjoy,
Darin
On Mon, 2004-07-26 at 14:45, Chris Shoemaker wrote:
Darin, et al.,
I've read the thread(s) regarding budgeting in gnucash. It
seemed that the design was sound and that things were progressing in the
right direction. I was hoping
601 - 614 of 614 matches
Mail list logo
