On Thu, Dec 21, 2000 at 05:24:54PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's been rumoured that Peter C. Norton said:
Interesting, I haven't looked at libgnc_engine. Have you, in turn, looked
at the gda library being developed for gnome-db?
Sort-of. libgda was one of the contributing
On Thu, Dec 21, 2000 at 04:51:44PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Of course, we still need to have libgnc_engine talk to an sql
database, and still need to slove the caching problems, and a bunch
of other issues. But I think a cheapo demo could be done really
quick (a few days/weeks) by
The various gnome-games packages, and maybe other parts of gnome. There
aren't many (any?) other widely-distributed packages, though.
-Peter
On Wed, Oct 18, 2000 at 12:43:01PM -0700, Dave Peticolas wrote:
Rob Browning writes:
Richard -Gilligan- Uschold [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm
Yeah, 1.3 is a pretty lackluster guile. And that's saying something :)
-Peter
On Wed, Oct 18, 2000 at 04:08:31PM +, Richard -Gilligan- Uschold wrote:
Rob Browning wrote:
As far as I can tell, the latest version of g-wrap works fine with
guile 1.3.4 and guile 1.4 on my system(s).
I believe that guile-1.3.4 ships w/ rh 7, so that shouldn't be a big deal
anymore.
-Peter
On Tue, Oct 24, 2000 at 06:14:16PM -0400, D-Man wrote:
Thanks for providing the RH 7.0 rpms.
I had a lot of trouble trying to upgrade before -- to build gnucash I needed g-wrap.
To build g-wrap I
On Thu, Aug 03, 2000 at 07:14:24PM +1000, Phillip J Shelton wrote:
Rather like the tar and dump systems for tape?
Every backup tool has the same goal. Tar is an archiver, though, not a
backup tool, and dump is also more archive-oriented. The filesystem log
hack that I've seen done gives you
Musicians also call it a "sharp" since western music notation is pretty
consistant as to what a sharp looks like :)
-Peter
On Mon, Jul 10, 2000 at 09:27:14PM -0700, Clark Jones wrote:
Correct. The character that most computer keyboards these days have as
"shift 3", sometimes referred to as
I learn something new every day.
On Mon, Jun 05, 2000 at 05:29:34PM -0700, Dave Peticolas wrote:
On Mon, Jun 05, 2000 at 03:36:06PM -0700, Dave Peticolas wrote:
I think that should be test ! -x ... instead. Could you try that?
No, ! test -x should works as well. What shell are you
On Sat, Jun 03, 2000 at 05:01:51AM -0500, Richard Wackerbarth wrote:
I agree. Using gint32 rather than int only solves part of the problem.
foo_t is much more flexible.It reduces the architecture dependency to a
single point in the code.
How is this different from using already-created
Well, mine can... My solaris 2.6 box is a little out of date, but libtool,
etc. aren't that hard to put in...
-Peter
On Tue, May 30, 2000 at 03:54:12PM +1000, Justin Clift wrote:
Hi all,
Does anyone else using Solaris have libtool?
I don't have a Solaris development box in front of me
10 matches
Mail list logo
