Re: [Patch] More convenience for entering account names (#144669 and #129099)

2008-05-07 Thread Derek Atkins
Thanks!!! -derek "C. Ernst" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > OK, Derek, > > you are right. It is more safe to introduce new properties with default to > false. > I added a new patch. > > Christoph > > 2008/5/6 Derek Atkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Christoph, > > Thanks for your work.

Re: [Patch] More convenience for entering account names (#144669 and #129099)

2008-05-06 Thread C. Ernst
OK, Derek, you are right. It is more safe to introduce new properties with default to false. I added a new patch. Christoph 2008/5/6 Derek Atkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Christoph, > > Thanks for your work. I replied in one of the bug reports but > I'll say the same thing here for a wider aud

Re: [Patch] More convenience for entering account names (#144669 and #129099)

2008-05-06 Thread Derek Atkins
Christoph, Thanks for your work. I replied in one of the bug reports but I'll say the same thing here for a wider audience. When you add a new boolean preference it should ALWAYS default to FALSE (not TRUE). The reason is that there's no way to differentiate between "schema item does not exist

[Patch] More convenience for entering account names (#144669 and #129099)

2008-05-05 Thread C. Ernst
Hi, the attachement contains a patch to fix both http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=144669 and http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=129099. It would be great, if somebody could check it out and confirm that it's working (local tests do so at least :-) Note: This attachement is for sim