1.9.6 bis

2006-05-26 Thread don Paolo Benvenuto
When I try to close gnucash with live data, it asks me for saving. Actually, when saved, the progress bar doesn't show anything. -- Buon Cammino! don Paolo Benvenuto Vuoi sapere di più su quello che succede qui? leggi il mio diario a http://www.chiesamissionaria.it/diario Visita l'enciclopedia

Re: 1.9.6

2006-05-26 Thread Chris Shoemaker
On Fri, May 26, 2006 at 10:48:07PM -0400, don Paolo Benvenuto wrote: > I installed 1.9.6 from unstable. > > First impressions. > > - In the main window, sorting by the total doesn't seem right (see the > corresponding screenshot) That's because you haven't sor

Re: 1.9.6

2006-05-27 Thread Andreas Köhler
Hi, On Saturday, 27 May 2006, 04:48 CEST, don Paolo Benvenuto wrote: > I installed 1.9.6 from unstable. > > First impressions. > > - The xml conversion druid: it's drammatically frightening the newbye. > Some more explication is due. > > It showed me a c

Re: 1.9.6

2006-05-27 Thread David Hampton
On Fri, 2006-05-26 at 23:34 -0400, Chris Shoemaker wrote: > On Fri, May 26, 2006 at 10:48:07PM -0400, don Paolo Benvenuto wrote: > > > > - Building a report is > > veeery long (>15 > > min) with my data file (a problem from 1.8.9). At least gnucas

Re: 1.9.6

2006-05-27 Thread David Hampton
On Fri, 2006-05-26 at 22:48 -0400, don Paolo Benvenuto wrote: > When I put the cursor over a drop down lists, the letters get the > colors of the tool, and so I can't read the string (the same thing is > present in all gnucash2) Is this only a problem with gnucash? Do any other gnome2 applicat

1.9.6 ter

2006-05-27 Thread don Paolo Benvenuto
Gnucash uses ctl-alt-pgup/down to move between tabs. Why doesn't it use the standard gnome shortcut ctl-pgup/down (without alt)? -- Buon Cammino! don Paolo Benvenuto Vuoi sapere di più su quello che succede qui? leggi il mio diario a http://www.chiesamissionaria.it/diario Visita l'enciclopedi

Re: 1.9.6

2006-05-27 Thread don Paolo Benvenuto
El vie, 26-05-2006 a las 23:34 -0400, Chris Shoemaker escribió: > > - Saving the file is slower than in 1.8.9? > > How much slower? about a 20% more -- Buon Cammino! don Paolo Benvenuto Vuoi sapere di più su quello che succede qui? leggi il mio diario a http://www.chiesamissionaria.it/diario

Re: 1.9.6

2006-05-27 Thread don Paolo Benvenuto
El vie, 26-05-2006 a las 23:34 -0400, Chris Shoemaker escribió: > > - opening the data file is slower than in 1.8.9? > > How much slower? between 50% and 100% slower -- Buon Cammino! don Paolo Benvenuto Vuoi sapere di più su quello che succede qui? leggi il mio diario a http://www.chiesamissi

1.9.6 quater

2006-05-27 Thread don Paolo Benvenuto
Autocompletion: when I begin entering the description of a txn, in 1.8.9 the automatically presented text was selected wright to left, so that with shft-arrow I could move the left part of the selection. Now shft-arrow moves the right part of the selection. I prefer as it was before. I think it's

Re: 1.9.6

2006-05-27 Thread Chris Shoemaker
On Sat, May 27, 2006 at 01:18:19PM -0400, David Hampton wrote: > > - Preferences: Toolbar style, text besides icons: not all icons show > > text > > This is normal. The "text beside icon" setting is also know as the > "priority text" setting. Only the most important should be labeled in > this

Re: 1.9.6

2006-05-27 Thread Chris Shoemaker
On Fri, May 26, 2006 at 10:48:07PM -0400, don Paolo Benvenuto wrote: > - gnucash crashed with the following: >- in a register I begun a new txn and put an account in a foreign > currency (not with the dialog window, directly in the register). >- without saving the txn, I hit 2 times the esc

Re: 1.9.6

2006-05-27 Thread don Paolo Benvenuto
El sáb, 27-05-2006 a las 13:10 -0400, David Hampton escribió: > > When I put the cursor over a drop down lists, the letters get the > > colors of the tool, and so I can't read the string (the same thing > is > > present in all gnucash2) > > Is this only a problem with gnucash? Do any other gnom

Re: 1.9.6

2006-05-27 Thread don Paolo Benvenuto
El sáb, 27-05-2006 a las 13:10 -0400, David Hampton escribió: > > - In the main window I miss a command to expand or shrink all the > > account hierarchy > > Try select and account and then holding the shift key and typing the > plus key on the keypad. This is a standard GTK key for expanding all

Re: 1.9.6

2006-05-27 Thread don Paolo Benvenuto
El sáb, 27-05-2006 a las 13:10 -0400, David Hampton escribió: > > - In the preferences (I'm using spanish localization), when passing > > from the 1st to the 2nd tab, something weird appears (see > screenshot). > > I have seen this behavior but don't know how to reproduce it. The > problem occurs

Re: 1.9.6

2006-05-28 Thread Derek Atkins
Chris Shoemaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> - I entered a txn with two currencies, it didn't ask me for the echange >> rate and put 1.00 as exchange rate > > I think this is a known bug. Yes it is a known bug. The workaround is to right-click in the split and click on Edit Exchange Rate to ma

Re: 1.9.6

2006-05-28 Thread don Paolo Benvenuto
El vie, 26-05-2006 a las 23:34 -0400, Chris Shoemaker escribió: > - a feature that was added in 1.x: the window title showing not only > the > > account name, but the parents account names too. I can't see it in > 1.9.6 > > -> [RFE] No, really it shows "account

Re: 1.9.6 bis

2006-05-26 Thread Chris Shoemaker
On Fri, May 26, 2006 at 10:51:18PM -0400, don Paolo Benvenuto wrote: > When I try to close gnucash with live data, it asks me for saving. > > Actually, when saved, the progress bar doesn't show anything. The progress bar is only meant to follow the progress of saving. Once the file is saved, the

Re: 1.9.6 ter

2006-05-27 Thread don Paolo Benvenuto
El sáb, 27-05-2006 a las 13:32 -0400, don Paolo Benvenuto escribió: > Gnucash uses ctl-alt-pgup/down to move between tabs. > > Why doesn't it use the standard gnome shortcut ctl-pgup/down (without > alt)? Besides that, ctl-alt-pgup/down works only when I am in the main accounts tab. After passing

Re: 1.9.6 ter

2006-05-28 Thread don Paolo Benvenuto
El sáb, 27-05-2006 a las 13:32 -0400, don Paolo Benvenuto escribió: > Gnucash uses ctl-alt-pgup/down to move between tabs. > > Why doesn't it use the standard gnome shortcut ctl-pgup/down (without > alt)? Besides that, when closing a tab, apparently there isn't a clear logic in the tab the user i

Re: 1.9.6 ter

2006-05-28 Thread David Hampton
On Sun, 2006-05-28 at 15:20 -0400, don Paolo Benvenuto wrote: > El sáb, 27-05-2006 a las 13:32 -0400, don Paolo Benvenuto escribió: > > Gnucash uses ctl-alt-pgup/down to move between tabs. > > > > Why doesn't it use the standard gnome shortcut ctl-pgup/down (without > > alt)? > > Besides that, wh

Re: 1.9.6 ter

2006-05-29 Thread David Hampton
On Sat, 2006-05-27 at 13:38 -0400, don Paolo Benvenuto wrote: > El sáb, 27-05-2006 a las 13:32 -0400, don Paolo Benvenuto escribió: > > Gnucash uses ctl-alt-pgup/down to move between tabs. > > > > Why doesn't it use the standard gnome shortcut ctl-pgup/down (without > > alt)? It does. Keystrokes

Re: 1.9.6 ter

2006-05-29 Thread don Paolo Benvenuto
El lun, 29-05-2006 a las 14:10 -0400, David Hampton escribió: > On Sat, 2006-05-27 at 13:38 -0400, don Paolo Benvenuto wrote: > > El sáb, 27-05-2006 a las 13:32 -0400, don Paolo Benvenuto escribió: > > > Gnucash uses ctl-alt-pgup/down to move between tabs. > > > > > > Why doesn't it use the standa

Re: 1.9.6 ter

2006-06-03 Thread David Hampton
On Mon, 2006-05-29 at 14:10 -0400, David Hampton wrote: > On Sat, 2006-05-27 at 13:38 -0400, don Paolo Benvenuto wrote: > > > > Besides that, ctl-alt-pgup/down works only when I am in the main > > accounts tab. After passing to a register with crl-alt-pgdown, then > > ctl-alt-pgup moves upwards in

1.9.6, 2.0 releng, schedule proposal

2006-05-07 Thread Josh Sled
Call for help: If 1.9.6 is going to go out tonight, there are still two failing tests (test-query and test-period) to resolve. For 2.0, as well, there's still a lot left. In particular... http://bugzilla.gnome.org/buglist.cgi?product=GnuCash&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=REOPEN

Release of GnuCash 1.9.6 (beta)

2006-05-14 Thread Chris Lyttle
The GnuCash development team proudly announces GnuCash 1.9.6 aka "Time to make a difference", the first beta release of the GnuCash Open Source Accounting Software which will eventually lead to the stable version 2.0.0. This release contains many bugfixes since the sixth unstab

Re: 1.9.6, 2.0 releng, schedule proposal

2006-05-07 Thread Chris Lyttle
Josh Sled wrote: I propose the following schedule: - 1.9.6 release today/tomorrow/Tue... (ultimately it'll be decided by the tests passing). - Weekly RC's until release, thus... - 2.0.0-rc1 on 14 May - 2.0.0-rc2 (or 2.0.0) on 21 May - 2.0.0-rc3 (or 2.0.0) on 28 May [...

Re: 1.9.6, 2.0 releng, schedule proposal

2006-05-07 Thread Derek Atkins
Quoting Chris Lyttle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Josh Sled wrote: I propose the following schedule: - 1.9.6 release today/tomorrow/Tue... (ultimately it'll be decided by the tests passing). - Weekly RC's until release, thus... - 2.0.0-rc1 on 14 May - 2.0.0-rc2 (or

Re: 1.9.6, 2.0 releng, schedule proposal

2006-05-07 Thread Josh Sled
On Sun, 2006-05-07 at 17:30 -0400, Derek Atkins wrote: > I'd prefer the rc tarballs to continue to be 1.9.x, if you don't mind. I don't care what they're called ... only that they're actually RCs. Specifically, we're intentionally not making any commits after some point. -- ...jsled http://asyn

Re: 1.9.6, 2.0 releng, schedule proposal

2006-05-07 Thread Derek Atkins
Quoting Josh Sled <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: On Sun, 2006-05-07 at 17:30 -0400, Derek Atkins wrote: I'd prefer the rc tarballs to continue to be 1.9.x, if you don't mind. I don't care what they're called ... only that they're actually RCs. Specifically, we're intentionally not making any commits af

Re: 1.9.6, 2.0 releng, schedule proposal

2006-05-08 Thread Christian Stimming
uot;don't do anything else"; Bug#332251). *sigh* I'm not at all a postgresql user/developer, but if we remove/hide this, it would be a feature regression compared to 1.8.x. I'd strongly vote to keep it enabled, but #332251 certainly is a showstopper for that... > Even if 1.9

Re: 1.9.6, 2.0 releng, schedule proposal

2006-05-08 Thread Mike Alexander
--On May 7, 2006 3:37:17 PM -0400 Josh Sled <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: For 2.0, as well, there's still a lot left. In particular... http://bugzilla.gnome.org/buglist.cgi?product=GnuCash&bug_status=NEW&; bug_status=REOPENED&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&target _milestone=2.0.0 ..

Re: 1.9.6, 2.0 releng, schedule proposal

2006-05-08 Thread Mike Alexander
--On May 7, 2006 3:37:17 PM -0400 Josh Sled <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Plus, we still need to reach decisions regarding removing or hiding: - Lots - sounds like "no", though we should hide the "View" button in the editor. Perhaps the best thing to do is to keep lots support but d

Re: 1.9.6, 2.0 releng, schedule proposal

2006-05-08 Thread Mark Johnson
Christian Stimming wrote: Yes. Can you define "RC" a bit more clearly? Maybe write a short remark about what that means into http://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Release_Schedule ? The definition is something like: "A test release which, if shown to be of sufficient quality, can become the relea

Re: 1.9.6, 2.0 releng, schedule proposal

2006-05-08 Thread Chris Shoemaker
On Mon, May 08, 2006 at 01:40:56PM -0400, Mike Alexander wrote: > This raises a meta question. Who has the authority to set the target > milestone field of a bug? Can someone who reports a bug set it or > should it be done by someone with more authority? > My advice: if bugzilla lets you, and

Re: 1.9.6, 2.0 releng, schedule proposal

2006-05-08 Thread Chris Shoemaker
On Mon, May 08, 2006 at 10:10:23AM +0200, Christian Stimming wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Josh Sled schrieb: > > Plus, we still need to reach decisions regarding removing or hiding: > > > > - Lots > > - sounds like "no", though we should hide the "View" butto

Re: 1.9.6, 2.0 releng, schedule proposal

2006-05-08 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Chris Shoemaker wrote: > On Mon, May 08, 2006 at 10:10:23AM +0200, Christian Stimming wrote: > >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> Josh Sled schrieb: >>> - PostGres support >>> - configure.in/building support >>> - Open/Save (more of a "don't do anything else"; Bu

Re: Release of GnuCash 1.9.6 (beta)

2006-05-14 Thread Bengt Thuree
On Må, 2006-05-15, 12:18, Chris Lyttle skrev: > The GnuCash development team proudly announces GnuCash 1.9.6 aka > "Time to make a difference", the first beta release of the GnuCash Open > Source Accounting Software which will eventually lead to the stable > version 2.0.0. &

Re: Release of GnuCash 1.9.6 (beta)

2006-05-17 Thread Derek Atkins
Hi Quoting Bob Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: I am getting an error from ./configure asking to install Guile or update to a later version but I have Guile 1.6.7 installed. Is this a bug? I don't know. What's the exact error? More likely you don't have the proper development packages installed.

Re: Release of GnuCash 1.9.6 (beta)

2006-06-04 Thread Bob Allen
I am getting an error from ./configure asking to install Guile or update to a later version but I have Guile 1.6.7 installed. Is this a bug? Bob. Chris Lyttle wrote: The GnuCash development team proudly announces GnuCash 1.9.6 aka "Time to make a difference", the first beta rele

Re: Release of GnuCash 1.9.6 (beta)

2006-06-04 Thread Bob Allen
Now I am stuck on ./configure with error: Could not find working gtkhtml version (3.1,3.2, . I tried yum install gtkhtml-devel and that failed too. Any pointers? I am running FC5 with the latest updates. Thanks, Bob. ___ gnucash-devel mailing

Re: Release of GnuCash 1.9.6 (beta)

2006-06-04 Thread Bob Allen
Ah, That's it. Thanks. Bob. Derek Atkins wrote: Hi Quoting Bob Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: I am getting an error from ./configure asking to install Guile or update to a later version but I have Guile 1.6.7 installed. Is this a bug? I don't know. What's the exact error? More likely you do

Re: Release of GnuCash 1.9.6 (beta)

2006-06-04 Thread Georgi Mirchev
this a bug? Bob. Chris Lyttle wrote: The GnuCash development team proudly announces GnuCash 1.9.6 aka "Time to make a difference", the first beta release of the GnuCash Open Source Accounting Software which will eventually lead to the stable version 2.0.0. This release contains man

g-wrap 1.9.6 fails to build on Solaris 10

2005-12-08 Thread Derek Atkins
Hi, I'm trying to build g-wrap 1.9.6 on Solaris 10. I'm cc'ing gnucash because this is all due to my attempts to build GnuCash on Solaris 10, and I couldn't find a mailing list specific to g-wrap development. Anyways, here's the GCC specs: --> gcc -v Reading specs

Re: 2.0.0 unfinished feature deactivation (was:1.9.6, 2.0 releng, schedule proposal)

2006-05-19 Thread Christian Stimming
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 >> Josh Sled wrote: >>> Plus, we still need to reach decisions regarding removing or hiding: >>> >>> - Lots >>> - sounds like "no", though we should hide the "View" button in >>> the editor. >>> >>> - Close Books >>> >>> - QSF Import [c

Proposing to release 1.9.6 although test is not yet fixed (Re: Fix test?)

2006-05-14 Thread Christian Stimming
Hi Chris, I was planning to spend some time on that, but not before mid of next week (maybe other devs are faster on that, though). BUT I would ask in this specific case to make the 1.9.6 release nevertheless and ASAP, because a whole bunch of non-SVN but 1.9.x users are waiting for the next

Re: Proposing to release 1.9.6 although test is not yet fixed (Re: Fix test?)

2006-05-14 Thread Josh Sled
On Sun, May 14, 2006 9:48 am, Christian Stimming wrote: > that should serve the developers, not the other way round. That's why for > this particular case, as we're still right in the middle of the unstable > releases, I'd suggest to have a 1.9.6 release nevertheless.

Re: Proposing to release 1.9.6 although test is not yet fixed (Re: Fix test?)

2006-05-14 Thread Chris Lyttle
Josh Sled wrote: On Sun, May 14, 2006 9:48 am, Christian Stimming wrote: that should serve the developers, not the other way round. That's why for this particular case, as we're still right in the middle of the unstable releases, I'd suggest to have a 1.9.6 release neverth

Re: Proposing to release 1.9.6 although test is not yet fixed (Re: Fix test?)

2006-05-14 Thread Josh Sled
On Sun, 2006-05-14 at 13:45 -0600, Chris Lyttle wrote: > OK. If someone can go ahead and disable this test I'll release 1.9.6 > later today. I've roughly commented out the test in the Makefile(.am). -- ...jsled http://asynchronous.org/ - `a=jsled; b=asynchronous.org; echo

Re: Proposing to release 1.9.6 although test is not yet fixed (Re: Fix test?)

2006-05-14 Thread Josh Sled
On Sun, 2006-05-14 at 17:06 -0400, Josh Sled wrote: > On Sun, 2006-05-14 at 13:45 -0600, Chris Lyttle wrote: > > OK. If someone can go ahead and disable this test I'll release 1.9.6 > > later today. > > I've roughly commented out the test in the Makefile(.am). I&

Re: Proposing to release 1.9.6 although test is not yet fixed (Re: Fix test?)

2006-05-14 Thread Mike Alexander
--On May 14, 2006 6:26:25 PM -0400 Josh Sled <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Sun, 2006-05-14 at 17:06 -0400, Josh Sled wrote: On Sun, 2006-05-14 at 13:45 -0600, Chris Lyttle wrote: > OK. If someone can go ahead and disable this test I'll release > 1.9.6 later today. I've