On Tue, 2006-05-02 at 00:36 -0400, Derek Atkins wrote:
Quoting Chris Shoemaker [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I'm still waiting for the merge of FreqSpec and Recurrence... You promised
that you'd merge them into a single API. I'm still waiting.
This isn't a 2.0 blocker. In fact, we probably don't want
Mike Alexander [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
--On April 30, 2006 10:48:09 AM -0400 Derek Atkins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Does the existing Lot Editor not work?
Do you mean the one you get to from Actions-Lot Viewer? Or is there
another one I haven't found? That one doesn't seem to provide
On Sun, Apr 30, 2006 at 11:06:21AM -0400, Josh Sled wrote:
Should we do a seperate RC in about a week (May 7th)?
Should we bother with RCs at all? All that really matters is that we
stop making commits at some point ... when should that point be? I'd
say 5/7 ... Wed 5/10 at the latest.
As
--On May 1, 2006 11:24:43 AM -0400 Derek Atkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do you mean the one you get to from Actions-Lot Viewer? Or is
there another one I haven't found? That one doesn't seem to
provide a way to change the assignment of splits to lots. You can
see what splits are in a
On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 11:16:39AM +0200, Christian Stimming wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear developers,
I'd like to have a short discussion about the planned 2.0.0 release
date, and which prerequisites have to be fulfilled so that we can
actually make that
Quoting Chris Shoemaker [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Regarding budgets, I think they're working well enough to leave
enabled. I don't know of any budget misbehavior. Since budgets are
new, there's not much user-expectation to live up to so I don't think
we have to worry about impressions. Right now,
--On April 30, 2006 12:11:27 AM -0400 David Hampton
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've applied this patch too. I don't think anyone else is working on
this code, so I'm willing to take whatever changes you have.
Thanks, this looks fine.
I'm not sure how soon I'll get back to working on this.
Quoting Mike Alexander [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
--On April 30, 2006 12:11:27 AM -0400 David Hampton
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've applied this patch too. I don't think anyone else is working on
this code, so I'm willing to take whatever changes you have.
Thanks, this looks fine.
I'm not sure
On Fri, 2006-04-28 at 11:16 +0200, Christian Stimming wrote:
only one blocker. I'd like to ask everyone to go through the other
(critical, major, normal) bugs and look for ones that *must* be resolved
before 2.0.0. Then mark those as a blocker -- if others think those are
not a blocker for
On Sun, 2006-04-30 at 03:36 -0400, Mike Alexander wrote:
Another thing that
I've thought of doing is to change the stock split druid to distribute
the new shares over all open lots in proportion to the size of each
lot. This is the main thing that isn't handled properly automatically
On Sun, 2006-04-30 at 17:47 -0400, Mike Alexander wrote:
In this sort of situation you would likely have separate GnuCash
accounts for the two portfolios. Both the stock split druid and the
lots manager are specific to a particular GnuCash account
I totally misread your previous message.
--On April 28, 2006 5:12:18 PM -0400 David Hampton
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What about lots? I've been playing around with them a bit and they
don't really seem ready for use. They are effectively disabled
right now because of the bug I mentioned in
On Sat, 2006-04-29 at 18:22 -0400, Mike Alexander wrote:
Thanks for committing this. Sorry about not putting it in bugzilla.
I'll transfer this there if you think it would be useful.
I probably would have found it and committed it earlier, but this is
fine for me.
I see that you changed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear developers,
I'd like to have a short discussion about the planned 2.0.0 release
date, and which prerequisites have to be fulfilled so that we can
actually make that release.
The Goal of 2.0.0 as written on
--On April 28, 2006 11:16:39 AM +0200 Christian Stimming
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Additionally, we should think a little bit about the newly introduced
features and whether they are ready for showtime already.
Specifically, are the budgeting-related features really working
good enough? If they
Quoting Mike Alexander [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
What about lots? I've been playing around with them a bit and they
don't really seem ready for use. They are effectively disabled right
now because of the bug I mentioned in
https://lists.gnucash.org/pipermail/gnucash-devel/2006-April/017154.html.
On Fri, 2006-04-28 at 13:29 -0400, Mike Alexander wrote:
What about lots? I've been playing around with them a bit and they
don't really seem ready for use. They are effectively disabled right
now because of the bug I mentioned in
17 matches
Mail list logo
