Re: Development Docs

2001-04-16 Thread Dave Peticolas
Christopher Browne writes: > Question: Is the Info documentation under active development, and is > it being pretty seriously used? Yes and yes. Although parts of it are a bit out of date atm, I plan on bringing them back up to date for the 1.6.0 release. > If that be the case, then I probably

Re: Development Docs

2001-04-16 Thread Bill Gribble
address. FYI, the header I get looks like this: Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Development Docs From: Christopher Browne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Thanks, b.g. ___ gnucash-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.gnumat

Development Docs

2001-04-16 Thread Christopher Browne
Question: Is the Info documentation under active development, and is it being pretty seriously used? If that be the case, then I probably should take the material in .../C/xacc-repdev.sgml and transform it into src/doc/design/reporting.texinfo, right? -- (concatenate 'string "aa454" "@freenet.car