Finishing the neverending QOF flamewar

2006-01-29 Thread Benoit Grégoire
On January 29, 2006 04:58 pm, Chris Shoemaker wrote: > On Sun, Jan 29, 2006 at 02:13:50PM -0500, Benoit Grégoire wrote: > > Neil has always been polite and argued with you on technical grounds. > > I agree that Neil's public emails have a certain tone of civility > that I can't bring myself to reci

Re: Finishing the neverending QOF flamewar

2006-01-30 Thread Neil Williams
On Monday 30 January 2006 6:01 am, Benoit Grégoire wrote: (I agree with all the points Benoit raised.) > There should probably be a discussion of each one individually to reach a > consensus, and settle with some sort of vote if there if one isn't reached. If I can just receive a little consider

Re: Finishing the neverending QOF flamewar

2006-01-30 Thread Chris Shoemaker
FTR, I want to clarify some things: I am _glad_ Neil wants to work on QOF. I think that an external QOF, of a certain design, and at a certain time, is a desirable thing. Relatively speaking, I am _not_ bothered by Neil breaking logging. I think it was an honest mistake due to some lack of

Re: Finishing the neverending QOF flamewar

2006-01-30 Thread Neil Williams
On Monday 30 January 2006 4:54 pm, Chris Shoemaker wrote: > Relatively speaking, I am _not_ bothered by Neil breaking logging. (I didn't break it, let's not start all that again. Change the record.) There is actually NO reason to discuss all this now - this should all wait until after G2 is ou

Re: Finishing the neverending QOF flamewar

2006-01-30 Thread Chris Shoemaker
On Mon, Jan 30, 2006 at 07:59:27PM +, Neil Williams wrote: > > Not a single message of any type, anywhere, is > > logged with my patch that wasn't logged before, nor vice-versa. > > You have no evidence for such a statement. I attest that messages ARE logged > that should not be logged beca

Re: Finishing the neverending QOF flamewar

2006-02-03 Thread Pierre THIERRY
Scribit Neil Williams dies 30/01/2006 hora 19:59: > > In fixing it, I improved the logging API, without affecting any > > existing QOF program. > Once again, Chris, that is inaccurate. Implementing logging for > modules that do not explicitly set their own log level DOES break > functionality in o

Re: Finishing the neverending QOF flamewar

2006-02-03 Thread Derek Atkins
Quoting Pierre THIERRY <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Scribit Neil Williams dies 30/01/2006 hora 19:59: > In fixing it, I improved the logging API, without affecting any > existing QOF program. Once again, Chris, that is inaccurate. Implementing logging for modules that do not explicitly set their own lo