It's been rumoured that Christopher Browne said:
> I think it needs more than just a version number.
> Suppose two independent updates try to take place "concurrently."
> One goes in, as "version 4," and another goes in, also proposed as
> "version 4." If all that is tracked is the version number
Christopher Browne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I think it needs more than just a version number.
>
> Suppose two independent updates try to take place "concurrently."
>
> One goes in, as "version 4," and another goes in, also proposed as
> "version 4." If all that is tracked is the version n
On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 12:51:44AM -0600, Christopher Browne wrote:
> On Tue, 02 Jan 2001 15:54:53 EST, the world broke into rejoicing as
> David Merrill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> > On Tue, Jan 02, 2001 at 02:38:45PM -0600, Christopher Browne wrote:
> > > On Tue, 02 Jan 2001 14:23:22 CST, the w
On Tue, 02 Jan 2001 15:54:53 EST, the world broke into rejoicing as
David Merrill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Tue, Jan 02, 2001 at 02:38:45PM -0600, Christopher Browne wrote:
> > On Tue, 02 Jan 2001 14:23:22 CST, the world broke into rejoicing as
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> > > It's been ru
