Robert Graham Merkel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Yeah, it's just that I was trying not to *force* people to upgrade
their g-wrap if don't have to. If we put in a call in gnucash
to an autoconf macro only distributed with 0.9.8, they have to
upgrade.
I have no objection to including the code
Dave Peticolas [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have added the patch to the devel tree and placed the patched
version of g-wrap.m4 in acinclude.m4. In the long run, though,
g-wrap.m4 should be picked up from the installation of g-wrap,
I think.
It is, at least in g-wrap 0.9.8.
If you'd like, I
Derek Atkins writes:
Dave Peticolas [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have added the patch to the devel tree and placed the patched
version of g-wrap.m4 in acinclude.m4. In the long run, though,
g-wrap.m4 should be picked up from the installation of g-wrap,
I think.
It is, at
Robert Graham Merkel writes:
Derek Atkins writes:
Ok, I've sucessfully got the mainline version of GnuCash to build
against g-wrap 0.9.8. I had to apply the following patches to GnuCash
and g-wrap respectively.
I've also built a set of RPMs for RedHat 6.2 (using my own spec-file
Derek Atkins writes:
Ok, I've sucessfully got the mainline version of GnuCash to build
against g-wrap 0.9.8. I had to apply the following patches to GnuCash
and g-wrap respectively.
I've also built a set of RPMs for RedHat 6.2 (using my own spec-file
which I created back in 0.9.1
Robert Graham Merkel writes:
Derek Atkins writes:
Ok, I've sucessfully got the mainline version of GnuCash to build
against g-wrap 0.9.8. I had to apply the following patches to GnuCash
and g-wrap respectively.
I've also built a set of RPMs for RedHat 6.2 (using my own spec-file
Ok, I've sucessfully got the mainline version of GnuCash to build
against g-wrap 0.9.8. I had to apply the following patches to GnuCash
and g-wrap respectively.
I've also built a set of RPMs for RedHat 6.2 (using my own spec-file
which I created back in 0.9.1 days back in May -- I have no idea
