On 09 Aug 1999 00:17:53 CDT, the world broke into rejoicing as
Rob Browning [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What struck me Friday morning was that I really should be
marshalling data into somewhat more organized "structures" rather
than just building assoc lists.
[
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The problem with SRFI's is that they still won't provide you with a
standard way of requesting facilities, e.g. - things like (require)
which is different from the DrScheme equivalent.
True, though my guess is that that'll be the subject of a future SRFI.
For now
I'm starting to look Rather More Seriously at understanding the transaction
engine.
This is encouraging me to establish sets of data structures on the Guile side
of the world to represent data in the two quite distinct forms:
a) QIF's "bunch of transactions that get attached to an ac
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What struck me Friday morning was that I really should be
marshalling data into somewhat more organized "structures" rather
than just building assoc lists.
[ General agreement. ]
I also finally grokked define-struct, and maybe am looking at is as
a "hammer," and
