David Merrill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> You misunderstood me. I won't be running it because it is proprietary,
> not because they dissed gnucash. It was a reporter that dissed
> gnucash anyway, not the kapital folks.
Also face it, the screenshots fron kapital are certainly much
spluftier tha
On Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 08:32:58PM -0700, Alan Orndorff wrote:
>
> > Which means I won't be running it. I was disappointed when I read an
> > article about this and saw gnucash dissed. I know gnucash isn't as
> > polished as quicken (yet), but it hasn't been in development for 10+
> > years, eith
> Which means I won't be running it. I was disappointed when I read an
> article about this and saw gnucash dissed. I know gnucash isn't as
> polished as quicken (yet), but it hasn't been in development for 10+
> years, either. And since nobody has even seen kapital, we really don't
> know where
On Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 06:57:16PM +1100, Robert Graham Merkel wrote:
> Looks interesting, but strictly personal finance, and closed source.
>
> http://www.thekompany.com/products/kapital/
Which means I won't be running it. I was disappointed when I read an
article about this and saw gnucash dis
Looks interesting, but strictly personal finance, and closed source.
http://www.thekompany.com/products/kapital/
Robert Merkel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"We can build a better product than Linux" - Jim Allchin,
ch
