iscussion
>>> here for a better solution, if exposing more of the Guile API is a)
>>> fixing a bug and/or b) adding a new feature. Since much of GnuCash
>>> was written in Guile, I thought I would use that instead of Python.
>>> As is, though, there doesn't seem
even source a GnuCash
>> using its Guile bindings. It can be done using Python.
>>
>> Chad
>>
>> --
>>
>> On Sun, Feb 19, 2017 at 5:34 PM, Derek Atkins wrote:
>>> That srfi didn't exist when the tests were written, which was probably
>>
Ted Creedon writes:
> FYI there is a swig problem in OpenSuse leap 4.2.
>
> Its not the latest version.
And this is why we package it up such that in general you don't need
swig to build GnuCash. :)
> Tedc
-derek
--
Derek Atkins, SB '93 MIT EE, SM '95 MIT Media Laboratory
Memb
are false positive. I haven't done a full audit. I just
>> wanted to give someone a heads up about this problem.
>>
>> I would submit a patch to fix the unit testing framework, but I
>> haven't actually worked out how it works. In the meantime, I'm
>> currently export
bindings. It can be done using Python.
>
> Chad
>
> --
>
> On Sun, Feb 19, 2017 at 5:34 PM, Derek Atkins wrote:
>> That srfi didn't exist when the tests were written, which was probably
>> around 18 years ago. The fact the tests don't fail just means
Hi,
Except for a few functions in app-utils, most of QofSession is not wrapped in
the scheme bindings like they are in the python bindings.
-derek
Sent from my mobile device. Please excuse any typos.
- Reply message -
From: "Chad Albers"
To:
Subject: Missing Guile Bindings
Hi,
I found some problems with some unit tests for the Guile bindings.
Here's the background.
Rather than use the Python bindings, I wanted to use guile to add/manipulate
my GnuCash data. From the Python bindings, I deduced that the entry
point into creating
transactions is via a construct calle
