:
http://gnucash.1415818.n4.nabble.com/Non-commiter-github-workflow-tp4656382p4656399.html
Sent from the GnuCash - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
gnucash-devel mailing list
gnucash-devel@gnucash.org
https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo
about is making it easy for
developers to contribute. In support of this, I think forking and following
the steps above provides that.
--
View this message in context:
http://gnucash.1415818.n4.nabble.com/Non-commiter-github-workflow-tp4656382p4656402.html
Sent from the GnuCash - Dev mailing list
this message in context:
http://gnucash.1415818.n4.nabble.com/Non-commiter-github-workflow-tp4656382.html
Sent from the GnuCash - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
gnucash-devel mailing list
gnucash-devel@gnucash.org
https://lists.gnucash.org
Hi John,
On 2012-08-21, at 12:41, John Ralls jra...@ceridwen.us wrote:
I'm not sure that we want to encourage people to publish their forks on
Github, or anywhere else.
I don't see the harm, as long as the website makes clear that Gnucash/gnucash
is the main repo.
Accounting software
On Aug 21, 2012, at 10:43 AM, Yawar Amin yawar.a...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi John,
On 2012-08-21, at 12:41, John Ralls jra...@ceridwen.us wrote:
I'm not sure that we want to encourage people to publish their forks on
Github, or anywhere else.
I don't see the harm, as long as the website
On 2012-08-21, at 13:56, John Ralls jra...@ceridwen.us wrote:
Accounting software isn't a domain where fast-and-loose development is a
good idea.
Neither is an OS kernel ;-)
Yup, and Torvalds doesn't accept pull requests via Github either [1].
Granted, I wouldn't want to use pull
