Rob Browning, in an immanent manifestation of deity, wrote:
If SWIG does a good job, then yes, but if it's not going to provide a
good solution, then I'd rather just see each interested group create
and maintain bindings for that language until/if/unless there's a
unified solution that actually
Rob Browning, in an immanent manifestation of deity, wrote:
On Wed, 01 Nov 2000 16:20:05 Clinton Popetz wrote:
| One key advantage of doing it in SWIG is that SWIG can spew out Python
| interfaces as well, and I hear there are people who actually like
| programming in Python. shudder :)
"Darren/Torin/Who Ever..." [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Okay. I'll look for this. If we're going to have to update a major
portion of the Perl API, we might want to just use XS. This would free
us from the dependency on swig. I have a lot more experience with XS as
well. :)
Hmm.
On Wed, 01 Nov 2000 16:20:05 Clinton Popetz wrote:
| One key advantage of doing it in SWIG is that SWIG can spew out Python
| interfaces as well, and I hear there are people who actually like
| programming in Python. shudder :)
|
Python is much nicer than perl anyways. ;-)
I like it a
On Wed, Nov 01, 2000 at 02:34:00PM -0600, Rob Browning wrote:
"Darren/Torin/Who Ever..." [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Okay. I'll look for this. If we're going to have to update a major
portion of the Perl API, we might want to just use XS. This would free
us from the dependen
"Darren/Torin/Who Ever..." [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I suspect that having easy bindings for Perl, Python, Tcl/Tk, and
Ruby pretty much says that we'll use SWIG.
If SWIG does a good job, then yes, but if it's not going to provide a
good solution, then I'd rather just see each interested group
of time, btw, as the API will have changed
quite a bit.
Okay. I'll look for this. If we're going to have to update a major
portion of the Perl API, we might want to just use XS. This would free
us from the dependency on swig. I have a lot more experience with XS as
well. :)
It might be useful
Dave Peticolas, in an immanent manifestation of deity, wrote:
Who uses the Perl API?
I do. But I suspect that I'm one of the few. I just don't have the
time to (re-)learn scheme. I used lisp in the 80s but these days, I
only use it for (X)Emacs.
The reason I ask is that the Perl API
"Darren/Torin/Who Ever..." writes:
Dave Peticolas, in an immanent manifestation of deity, wrote:
Who uses the Perl API?
I do. But I suspect that I'm one of the few. I just don't have the
time to (re-)learn scheme. I used lisp in the 80s but these days, I
only use it fo
Who uses the Perl API?
The reason I ask is that the Perl API is rapidly becoming out-of-date
as the engine is extended and the swig interface is not kept up to date.
Given the difficulties of using swig, we'd like to drop it.
Is there any interest in keeping the Perl API? Is anyone interested
10 matches
Mail list logo
