On 18 Dec 2000 13:00:56 EST, the world broke into rejoicing as
Derek Atkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Christopher Browne [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It shouldn't be a situation of the GUI submitting database queries;
instead, the GUI should submit _transaction_ queries to the engine, and
the
to consider how adding the ability to calculate
totals to the Query API might work?
Anyway, I'm pleased to have this working, and as soon as Rob and I
sort out a new g-wrap release I'll send out the patch.
Robert Merkel
Bryan Larsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
2. Transactions can appear more than once. That seems pretty durn wacky.
Dave: what did we decide about this? Is it a problem with the Split**
I am generating, or a natural side effect of the way the register
works? I remember that discussion about
There's support for user-provided query predicates, which I engineered
with Scheme in mind; if you have a user filter-pred that's a scheme
thunk, it's possible to add it to queries also. I just need to write
a little C wrapper to call it.
I definitely don't need this, as the find dialog
Bryan Larsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
2. Transactions can appear more than once. That seems pretty durn wacky.
Dave: what did we decide about this? Is it a problem with the Split**
I am generating, or a natural side effect of the way the register
works? I remember that discussion
On Fri, 21 Apr 2000, Dave Peticolas wrote:
Bryan Larsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
2. Transactions can appear more than once. That seems pretty durn wacky.
Dave: what did we decide about this? Is it a problem with the Split**
I am generating, or a natural side effect of the way the
On Fri, 21 Apr 2000, Bryan Larsen wrote:
I've run up against the exact same problem in the "transactions 2" report.
I haven't done anything about it, but it was my opinion that duplicates
should only be removed if:
1) in a multi-line report format, and
2) are in the same subsection.
the
Are you saying that I should NEVER have multiple lines of a split transaction
which "duplicate" other lines of the transaction?
I was talking about something else entirely. But thanks for the excellent
example that illustrates the problem.
If you use the find dialog, and search on
