Hi Derek,
FYI, the e-guile link is back up:
http://woozle.org/~neale/repos/eguile/eguile.html
I looked at it. It appears intuitive and nice to
use. However, how does that fit with
Josh Sled's simple roadmap explanation after G2? E.g.,
We've been really focused on the G2 port and 2.0,
and
IMNSHO, what Josh means is that the WAY gnucash uses guile needs to
be fixed, and the way that gnucash is so /dependent/ on guile needs
to be fixed. Guile needs to be removed from the startup sequence.
Gnucash needs to depend LESS upon guile.
But I don't EVER see guile being /completely/
On Tue, 2005-11-01 at 06:16 -0800, Brian Rose wrote:
Is Scheme/Guile staying in or going out? Would
e-guile be deleted within the year
and replaced?
:) Good question. In my ideal world, we would remove it entirely and
find a different, light-weight templating system for the reports ...
Title: RE: E-guile link
I have no opinion about using scheme or not for anything, but if there are folks who want to get rid of it; we can evaluate the use of XSLT as a templating engine. I've used it and it's okay but I suspect that eguile is much more flexible.
Tracy.
-Original
but I suspect that eguile is
much more flexible.
Tracy.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Josh Sled
Sent: Tue 11/1/2005 7:43 AM
To: Brian Rose
Cc: gnucash-devel@lists.gnucash.org
Subject: Re: E-guile link
On Tue, 2005-11-01 at 06:16 -0800, Brian Rose wrote
On Tuesday 01 November 2005 6:34 pm, Derek Atkins wrote:
Nah, might as well focus on eguile in the short term.
-derek
Tracy Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have no opinion about using scheme or not for anything, but if there
are folks who want to get rid of it; we can evaluate the use
