> >so, doesn't anyone out there use redhat? is there not one soul who wishes to
> >have the most recent gnucash packaged in an rpm?
> >
> >please?
> >
> >or am i.. alone lone lone lone ne ne...? *fading echo*
>
> Me! :) I do. Do you have one? If so, where?
hey Paul..
no, i don't yet
In a message dated: Tue, 12 Oct 1999 15:08:12 PDT
dave said:
>
>so, doesn't anyone out there use redhat? is there not one soul who wishes to
>have the most recent gnucash packaged in an rpm?
>
>please?
>
>or am i.. alone lone lone lone ne ne...? *fading echo*
Me! :) I do. Do you have
In a message dated: Wed, 13 Oct 1999 19:22:47 EDT
"Mehul N. Sanghvi" said:
>
>'allo,
>
> where does one get cbb from ? I'd like to try it out and see how
>it compares to GnuCash.
The main page can be found here:
http://www.menet.umn.edu/~clolson/cbb/
--
Seeya,
Paul
> Unfortunately, less complete in that:
> b) I haven't been able to get accounts or transactions to get "committed"
>in from the Guile side of things. (e.g. - see test.scm, which I *think*
>has gotten committed into CVS... Attached below...)
Done! I just submitted several patches whic
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Unfortunately, less complete in that:
> a) Lack of time to get to completion, and
> b) I haven't been able to get accounts or transactions to get "committed"
>in from the Guile side of things. (e.g. - see test.scm, which I *think*
>has gotten committed into CV
Dave Peticolas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> A general question on patches -- Several patches have been submitted
> since the list came back up. Is someone with CVS access monitoring
> them?
Well, linas normally handles all patches, but he's been a little busy
lately. I suspect he's going to ge
On Wed, 13 Oct 1999 18:45:25 PDT, the world broke into rejoicing as
Dave Peticolas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> Wow, thanks for such a complete reply!
> But, I have more questions :)
>
> > If that's the guile code that Christopher (I think it was) was working
> > on just before the server went
"Mehul N. Sanghvi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 'allo,
>
> where does one get cbb from ? I'd like to try it out and see how
> it compares to GnuCash.
The one I use if from the Redhat Powertools
Here are a few place dredged up with rpmfind.
1: ftp://rpmfind.net/linux/MandrakeCooker/SRPM
Wow, thanks for such a complete reply!
But, I have more questions :)
> If that's the guile code that Christopher (I think it was) was working
> on just before the server went down, then it's intended to be much
> more complete than the current C code, but I don't know if it's
Complete in what s
Dave Peticolas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Rob, can you explain the intended uses for guile in gnucash? I.e.,
> if we wanted to contribute new functionality to gnucash, should we
> write it in guile, not C?
Well, to some extent it's up to you.
I would write things that might be useful for th
'allo,
where does one get cbb from ? I'd like to try it out and see how
it compares to GnuCash.
la8r,
mehul
>
>
> yo.
>
> > Finally junked it all in favor of cbb. Which installs easily and
> > seems rock solid. Probably lacks lots of functionality that a
> > (working) gnucash
> > *) It doesn't appear to be possible to move accounts in a account
> > hierarchy after that account has been created.
>
> This is something I've been thinking about working on when I have the
> time. Actually, I'd like to write it in guile and bind it to a menu.
> It'd be a good example to
Pat Spinler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> There are still a few crashes and such, so take precautions !
> Personally, I:
>
> *) make a backup of my accounts before every time I use gnucash
> *) save often
This is good advice, especially for anyone using the CVS tree.
GnuCash (the lesstif s
Suffering Redhat Users:
You can take some heart. I've compiled and used gnucash 1.2.x on my
redhat 6.0 system, and I even have some (source) rpms around to ease the
port. I can send these to anyone who would like a copy.
Check out the mailing list archive for August, 1999 "War story:
installi
"Paul L. Lussier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In a message dated: 13 Oct 1999 05:03:24 PDT
> Harry Putnam said:
>
> >Cbb can import or export *.qif (quicken) files, and I think I remember
> >seeing in gnucash documentaton where it can too, so that would handle
> >at least some data transfer.
In a message dated: 13 Oct 1999 05:03:24 PDT
Harry Putnam said:
>Cbb can import or export *.qif (quicken) files, and I think I remember
>seeing in gnucash documentaton where it can too, so that would handle
>at least some data transfer.
The on drawback to cbb is that it does not support recurri
dave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> i'd go with cbb for now too, but what about the database that it
> makes?.. will they be compatible? if a stable/easy-to-install
> gnucash rpm comes out, how are you planning on using your old
> financial information in the new one?
On a more serious note:
C
dave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> i'd go with cbb for now too, but what about the database that it
> makes?.. will they be compatible? if a stable/easy-to-install
> gnucash rpm comes out, how are you planning on using your old
> financial information in the new one?
Not a problem here as my ol
> I'm interested in GnuCash so think I will try the installs again and
> maybe report my problems here.
>
> Would that be considered part of devel?
I think it would be helpful. I had a lot of trouble
getting it installed as well, and it does seem to
require a lot of extra packages.
It might b
Harry Putnam writes:
> Take heart ... Another RedHat user has surfaced. I had such a hard
> time getting GnuCash to install from rpm, and when I did finally get
> all deps satisfied it seemed buggy and unstable. Sorry I have no
> facts left. I saw nowhere to post my troubles so eventually j
As a sidenote, the gnucash package that comes in debian (potato) works great (motif
version).
Gerard
dave wrote:
> yo.
>
> > Finally junked it all in favor of cbb. Which installs easily and
> > seems rock solid. Probably lacks lots of functionality that a
> > (working) gnucash would have.
>
yo.
> Finally junked it all in favor of cbb. Which installs easily and
> seems rock solid. Probably lacks lots of functionality that a
> (working) gnucash would have.
hmm, i looked into cbb for a minute, but to be honest it didn't look darn near as
pretty as gnucash did.. =)
i'd go with cb
dave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> so, doesn't anyone out there use redhat? is there not one soul who wishes to have
>the most recent gnucash packaged in an rpm?
>
> please?
>
> or am i.. alone lone lone lone ne ne...? *fading echo*
Take heart ... Another RedHat user has surfaced. I
so, doesn't anyone out there use redhat? is there not one soul who wishes to have the
most recent gnucash packaged in an rpm?
please?
or am i.. alone lone lone lone ne ne...? *fading echo*
-
the real dave
--
Gnucash Developer's List
To unsubscribe send empty email to:
24 matches
Mail list logo