On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 08:42:13PM -0500, Josh Sled wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-01-16 at 12:58 +0100, Andreas Köhler wrote:
> > currently the code base depends on GLib >= 2.4, Pango >= 1.6 and GTK+ >=
> > 2.4. I would like to propose higher base versions, at least for GLib,
> > better for all three of th
On Wed, 2007-01-17 at 20:42 -0500, Josh Sled wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-01-16 at 12:58 +0100, Andreas Köhler wrote:
> > currently the code base depends on GLib >= 2.4, Pango >= 1.6 and GTK+ >=
> > 2.4. I would like to propose higher base versions, at least for GLib,
> > better for all three of them.
> [
On Tue, 2007-01-16 at 12:58 +0100, Andreas Köhler wrote:
> currently the code base depends on GLib >= 2.4, Pango >= 1.6 and GTK+ >=
> 2.4. I would like to propose higher base versions, at least for GLib,
> better for all three of them.
[deletia]
> There might be other reasons, like removing the bur
Andreas Köhler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
> currently the code base depends on GLib >= 2.4, Pango >= 1.6 and GTK+ >=
> 2.4. I would like to propose higher base versions, at least for GLib,
> better for all three of them.
I occasionally build packages for RHEL 4; if this was the case for 2.2,
I'd p
Hi,
currently the code base depends on GLib >= 2.4, Pango >= 1.6 and GTK+ >=
2.4. I would like to propose higher base versions, at least for GLib,
better for all three of them.
* GLib 2.6.0, Pango 1.8.0 and GTK+ 2.6.0 were released in December
2004. All major distributions should be
