On Sat, 03 Jun 2000, Robert Graham Merkel wrote:
> Christopher Browne writes:
> > What GnuCash probably needs is to _pervasively_ use gint32 rather than
> > int, gnit32 rather than long, and such. Of course, someone has to
> > volunteer to do the global-search-and-replace on this sort of thing
On Sat, Jun 03, 2000 at 05:01:51AM -0500, Richard Wackerbarth wrote:
>
> I agree. Using gint32 rather than int only solves part of the problem.
> foo_t is much more flexible.It reduces the architecture dependency to a
> single point in the code.
How is this different from using already-created
On Sat, Jun 03, 2000 at 10:20:40AM -0700, Peter C. Norton wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 03, 2000 at 05:01:51AM -0500, Richard Wackerbarth wrote:
> > I agree. Using gint32 rather than int only solves part of the problem.
> > foo_t is much more flexible.It reduces the architecture dependency to a
> > single
On Sat, 03 Jun 2000 22:06:09 PDT, the world broke into rejoicing as
Dylan Paul Thurston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Sat, Jun 03, 2000 at 10:20:40AM -0700, Peter C. Norton wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 03, 2000 at 05:01:51AM -0500, Richard Wackerbarth wrote:
> > > I agree. Using gint32 rather than int
> On Sat, 03 Jun 2000 22:06:09 PDT, the world broke into rejoicing as
> Dylan Paul Thurston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> > On Sat, Jun 03, 2000 at 10:20:40AM -0700, Peter C. Norton wrote:
> > > On Sat, Jun 03, 2000 at 05:01:51AM -0500, Richard Wackerbarth wrote:
> > > > I agree. Using gint32 rathe
Hendrik Boom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> #define G_MININT INT_MIN
> #define G_MAXINT INT_MAX
>
> in glibconfig.h, but nowhere do I see a G_MAXINT32.
>
> Or is there something else I need to knw?
You'd have to define these too if glib didn't.
--
Rob Browning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PG
